Background: Multiplatform molecular subtyping has been put into clinical practice as an alternative for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based classification for endometrial cancer (EC), which proved a tool for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment. The traditional methods for the molecular classification of EC only based on pathological indicators are not accurate. The present study aimed to classify EC on a molecular level and explored the possibility of a one-time solution to guide clinical treatment and prognosis determination by utilizing data from a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. The ultimate aim was to utilize multiplatform testing to overcome disadvantages of long detection periods and limitations in the information regarding genetic variation.Methods: An NGS-panel was produced using FFPE samples isolated from 86 patients pathologically diagnosed with EC, and molecular subtyping was performed according to the recommended criteria. In addition, 45 matched samples from 86 patients were randomly selected for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of P53, MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6. Another 41 samples were not analyzed due to incomplete IHC staining results. SPSS (V26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results:The molecular typing ratio of the 86 cases of endometrial carcinoma was calculated to be 16.28% for POLE type, 17.44% for MSI-H type, 47.67% for CN-L type, 12.79% for CN-H type, 5.81% for unclassified case. A comparison between IHC ProMisE-based subtyping and NGS-based subtyping of the 45 cases revealed that 3 cases were classified as MSI-H by IHC but as MSS by NGS. Among these cases, 1 case was deficient in MLH1 expression and PMS2 protein expression but had wild-type P53 protein, and the P53 sequencing data of this sample showed a missense mutation. Good overall consistency between the 2 determination methods was shown. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that NGS had particularly high specificity and sensitivity for detecting the MSI and CN subtypes [area under the curve (AUC) =0.893>0.5, P=0.000029<0.01]. Conclusions:The present study suggested that NGS-based subtyping could serve as an effective approach for the molecular typing of EC. Both NGS and IHC bear their own unique advantages and challenges in clinical practice.
BackgroundEGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFR ex20ins) constitute a heterogeneous subset of EGFR-activating alterations. However, the effectiveness of standard therapy in patients with EGFR ex20ins remains poor.MethodsIn our study, we retrospectively collected next-generation sequencing (NGS) data from 7,831 Chinese NSCLC patients and analyzed the relationship between EGFR ex20ins variations and medical records.ResultsOur data showed that EGFR ex20ins account for up to 3.5% of all EGFR mutation non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 1.6% of all NSCLC patients in China. Thirty-eight different variants of EGFR ex20ins were identified in 129 NSCLC patients. We observed that the patients with EGFR ex20ins may benefit from the anti-angiogenesis agents significantly (P = 0.027). In the EGFR ex20ins near-loop group, patients who received second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy treatment as first-line treatment had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than those who initiated treatment with first-generation EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy. Patients with co-mutations of EGFR ex20ins near-loop and TP53 tended to have a shorter OS in second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI therapy (P = 0.039). Additionally, median PFS was significantly longer in patients harboring EGFR ex20ins far-loop variants who received chemotherapy as a first-line setting (P = 0.037).ConclusionsOverall survival was significantly longer in EGFR ex20ins patients with anti-angiogenesis agents. For the choice of first-line strategy, NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins near-loop variants may benefit from second-/third-generation EGFR-TKI, while patients harboring EGFR ex20ins far-loop variants might have better outcomes from chemotherapy. TP53 could serve as a potential predictive marker in poor prognosis for EGFR ex20ins near-loop patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.