Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation following myeloablative therapy is a mainstay of treatment for various types of malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between the Optia MNC and COBE Spectra MNC systems (Terumo BCT, Japan) according to apheresis procedures and the parameters of apheresis, products, and collection. The clinical data of 74 patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection from July 2012 to July 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients comprised 48 (65%) men and 26 (35%) women with a median age of 56 yr (range, 23–66 yr). Of 216 procedures, 111 (51%) and 105 (49%) were processed by using COBE and Optia MNC, respectively. PBSC collection rates, throughput, numbers of stem cells retrieved, collection efficacy, and platelet loss were compared. There were no significant differences in the median CD34+ cell counts of collected products (0.61×108 vs 0.94×108), CD34 collection efficiency (43.5% vs 42.1%), and loss of platelets (40.1% vs 44.7%). The Spectra Optia MNC apheresis system was comparable to the COBE Spectra system in collecting autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells and retention of platelets.

Introduction: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has become a standard treatment option for many oncology patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two cell separators, Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Japan) and Amicus (Fresenius-Kabi) for autologous PBSC collection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 56 apheresis by Spectra Optia with Continuous Mononuclear Cell Collection (cMNC) from 20 patients, and 50 apheresis by Amicus from 27 patients between December 2018 and December 2019. CD34+ collection efficiency (CE2) and platelet (PLT) loss were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference in CD34+ CE2 between Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 28.8%) and Amicus (median, 33.1%; P = 0.537). PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus (median, 28.6%) than in Spectra Optia with cMNC (median, 37.8%; P = 0.009). Conclusion: CD34+ CE2 was comparable between Spectra Optia and Amicus, and PLT loss was significantly lower in Amicus. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report comparing autologous PBSC collection of the Spectra Optia and Amicus. These results may provide general guidance with regard to device selection to apheresis clinics that use both separators for optimal outcomes depending on each patient's characteristics.

Background: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is important for successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This study aimed to investigate the laboratory parameters associated with the optimal timing of autologous PBSC collection from lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from 1105 PBSC apheresis procedures performed on 379 adult patients at the National Cancer Center between June 2005 and December 2019. Laboratory parameters, including cutoff values for the number of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and circulating CD34 + cells, were analyzed to determine their association with CD34+ cell yield. Results: The pre-apheresis HPC and CD34+ cell count were statistically significant variables associated with harvested CD34+ cell in lymphoma and MM patients. The optimal cutoff values were 18 × 10 6 /L for pre-HPC count (66.8% sensitivity, 66.4% specificity) and 11/μL for pre-CD34+ cell count (85.8% sensitivity, 87.2% specificity), to achieve CD34+ cell yields ≥ 1.0 × 10 6 /kg for each apheresis procedure. Moreover, the optimal cutoff values were 23 × 10 6 /L for pre-HPC count (71.0% sensitivity, 69.0% specificity) and 18/μL for pre-CD34+ cell count (87.5% sensitivity, 86.3% specificity) to achieve CD34+ cell yields ≥ 2.0 × 10 6 /kg for each apheresis procedure. Conclusion: HPC count is a potential surrogate marker for monitoring the starting time for PBSC collection. Applying cutoff values for the number of HPC and CD34+ cells may be clinically useful for optimizing the timing of PBSC collection. K E Y W O R D S apheresis, autologous, CD34+ cells, hematopoietic progenitor cells, peripheral blood stem cell 1 | INTRODUCTION Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an established procedure for many hematological malignancies. Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation Jung Hee Kong and Youmi Hu contributed equally to this work.

No abstract

Background: Donor granulocyte transfusion has been used as a salvage treatment for neutropenic patients with severe infection who did not respond to antibiotics. Here we investigated hematological parameters of granulocyte collection to evaluate its efficacy and safety. Methods: The clinical data for 92 procedures of granulocyte collection performed on 82 healthy donors from April 2007 to July 2014 at National Cancer Center were reviewed retrospectively. Healthy donors were pre-medicated 12 hours before apheresis with subcutaneous injection of 600 g of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without 8 mg of oral dexamethasone. Blood cell counts of donors at the time of pre-and post-granulocyte collection state of donors were investigated and any clinical symptoms and signs were monitored during the procedure. Results: he median age was 29 years old (range, 18∼52). The mean of collected granulocyte volume was 230 mL, and the granulocyte yield in apheresis products was 4.90×10 10 (1.46∼7.86). Granulocyte yields showed significant correlation with volume of granulocyte collection, total processing volume, pre-WBC count, and pre-ANC. Granulocyte yields of dexamethasone and G-CSF administration were greater than with G-CSF administration alone. Pain (low back, hip, knee, and whole body), insomnia, fatigue, abdominal discomfort, and/or headache occurred in 21% of donors during mobilization. Conclusion: Granulocyte mobilization was safe and effective, and is well-tolerable in healthy donors because collection was possible in all donors without complications of G-CSF and dexamethasone administration and apheresis. (Korean J Blood Transfus 2015;26:132-141)