Background: Tightness of hip flexor muscles has been recognized as a risk factor for various musculoskeletal injuries in the lower extremities. Purpose:The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of two hip flexor stretching techniques (dynamic and hold-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, HR-PNF) on hip extension (ROM), knee joint position sense (JPS) and balance in healthy college age students who exhibit tightness in hip flexor muscles.Study Design: Pretest-posttest randomized experimental groups.Methods: Thirty-six healthy college age students (mean = 22.37 years) with tight hip flexors participated in this study. Hip extension ROM, knee joint position sense and dynamic balance were tested pre-and post-stretching using a digital inclinometer, an iPod touch and the Y-Balance test, respectively. Subjects were randomly divided into dynamic and HR-PNF stretching groups. Three-way mixed analysis of variance was utilized to explore if an interaction existed between the groups in tested variables.Results: There was a significant effect of time on hip extension ROM in both groups (p < 0.001). There was also a significant effect of stretch type on hip extension ROM (p = 0.004) favoring hold-relax over dynamic stretching group. There was a non-significant effect of time on mean knee joint position replication error in both groups. There was a significant main effect of time on the Y-Balance test's mean distance of reach to posteromedial and posterolateral directions (p < 0.001). There was also a significant main effect of directions of reach on distances achieved (p < 0.001) favoring posterolateral over posteromedial, and the latter over anterior direction. Conclusions:The results of this study demonstrated the effectiveness of both HR-PNF and dynamic stretching techniques which resulted in a significant acute improvement in hip extension ROM and dynamic balance measures, with HR-PNF being more effective than dynamic stretch. However, there were no significant improvements in knee joint position replication over time in either stretching group.

No abstract

BackgroundCreatine supplementation is recommended as an ergogenic aid to improve repeated sprint cycling performance. Furthermore, creatine uptake is increased in the presence of electrolytes. Prior research examining the effect of a creatine-electrolyte (CE) supplement on repeated sprint cycling performance, however, did not show post-supplementation improvement. The purpose of this double blind randomized control study was to investigate the effect of a six-week CE supplementation intervention on overall and repeated peak and mean power output during repeated cycling sprints with recovery periods of 2 min between sprints.MethodsPeak and mean power generated by 23 male recreational cyclists (CE group: n = 12; 24.0 ± 4.2 years; placebo (P) group: n = 11; 23.3 ± 3.1 years) were measured on a Velotron ergometer as they completed five 15-s cycling sprints, with 2 min of recovery between sprints, pre- and post-supplementation. Mixed-model ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses.ResultsA supplement-time interaction showed a 4% increase in overall peak power (pre: 734 ± 75 W; post: 765 ± 71 W; p = 0.040; ηp2 = 0.187) and a 5% increase in overall mean power (pre: 586 ± 72 W; post: 615 ± 74 W; p = 0.019; ηp2 = 0.234) from pre- to post-supplementation for the CE group. For the P group, no differences were observed in overall peak (pre: 768 ± 95 W; post: 772 ± 108 W; p = 0.735) and overall mean power (pre: 638 ± 77 W; post: 643 ± 92 W; p = 0.435) from pre- to post-testing. For repeated sprint analysis, peak (pre: 737 ± 88 W; post: 767 ± 92 W; p = 0.002; ηp2 = 0.380) and mean (pre: 650 ± 92 W; post: 694 ± 87 W; p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.578) power output were significantly increased only in the first sprint effort in CE group from pre- to post-supplementation testing. For the P group, no differences were observed for repeated sprint performance.ConclusionA CE supplement improves overall and repeated short duration sprint cycling performance when sprints are interspersed with adequate recovery periods.

ABSTRACT. San Juan, J.G., J.A. Yaggie, S. Levy, V. Mooney, B. Udermann, and J.M. Mayer. Effects of pelvic stabilization on lumbar muscle activity during dynamic exercise. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(4):000-000. 2005.-Many commonly utilized lowback exercise devices offer mechanisms to stabilize the pelvis and to isolate the lumbar spine, but the value of these mechanisms remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pelvic stabilization on the activity of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles during dynamic back extension exercise. Fifteen volunteers in good general health performed dynamic extension exercise in a seated upright position on a lumbar extension machine with and without pelvic stabilization. During exercise, surface electromyographic activity of the lumbar multifidus and biceps femoris was recorded. The activity of the multifidus was 51% greater during the stabilized condition, whereas there was no difference in the activity of the biceps femoris between conditions. This study demonstrates that pelvic stabilization enhances lumbar muscle recruitment during dynamic exercise on machines. Exercise specialists can use these data when designing exercise programs to develop low back strength.

No abstract