Lung cancers are the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) being the most aggressive type. At the time of diagnosis, SCLC has usually already metastasized, and an astonishing 95% of patients eventually succumb to the disease. This highlights the need for more effective SCLC screening and treatment options. Interestingly, the earliest and most frequent genetic alteration associated with lung cancers involves a lesion in the region to which the RNA binding protein RBM5 maps. We have recently shown that a decrease in RBM5 expression may be a key step in SCLC development, as RBM5 regulated many transformation-associated processes in SCLC cells. RBM5 is structurally and functionally similar to another RNA binding protein, RBM10. Both proteins have tumor-suppressor properties in a variety of cancer cell lines, and it has been suggested that RBM5 expression can influence RBM10. Due to their similarities, and the recent evidence that RBM10 is mutated in up to 21% of lung cancers, we hypothesized that RBM10 would share RBM5’s tumor-suppressor properties in SCLC. Using transcriptome analysis and functional assays, we show, however, that RBM10’s function was opposite to what we hypothesized; in the endogenously RBM5-null GLC20 SCLC cell line, RBM10 actually promoted cell proliferation and other transformation-associated processes. Using RNA immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing (RIP-Seq) and Western blotting, we demonstrate that RBM5 post-transcriptionally regulated RBM10 expression via direct interaction with specific RBM10 splice variants. We propose a working model describing the impact of this interaction on cellular processes. Our results provide evidence that RBM10 expression, in RBM5-null tumors, may contribute to tumor growth and metastasis. Measurement of both RBM10 and RBM5 expression in clinical samples may therefore hold prognostic and/or potentially predictive value.

RBM10 is an RNA binding motif (RBM) protein expressed in most, if not all, human and animal cells. Interest in RBM10 is rapidly increasing and its clinical importance is highlighted by its identification as the causative agent of TARP syndrome, a developmental condition that significantly impacts affected children. RBM10's cellular functions are beginning to be explored, with initial studies demonstrating a tumor suppressor role. Very recently, however, contradictory results have emerged, suggesting a tumor promoter role for RBM10. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on RBM10, and address this dichotomy in RBM10 function. Furthermore, we discuss what may be regulating RBM10 function, particularly the importance of RBM10 alternative splicing, and the relationship between RBM10 and its paralogue, RBM5. As RBM10‐related work is gaining momentum, it is critical that the various aspects of RBM10 molecular biology revealed by recent studies be considered moving forward. It is only if these recent advances in RBM10 structure and function are considered that a clearer insight into RBM10 function, and the disease states with which RBM10 mutation is associated, will be gained.

RBM5 and RBM10 play an important role in transformed cells. This role includes influencing the alternative splicing and/or expression of factors involved in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. To date, all apoptosis studies relating to RBM5 and RBM10 have been performed in transformed cell lines, potentially confounding mechanistic interpretation because of the many mutations present in this population. The objective of this study was to identify a physiologically relevant non-transformed system in which to examine the expression of RBM5 and RBM10 for future mechanistic and target identification studies. Our system of choice was H9c2 myoblast differentiation. Expression of Rbm5, Rbm10, and selected splice variants was examined by end-point or real-time PCR and Western blot. We determined that all of the examined Rbm5 and Rbm10 variants were expressed in H9c2 myoblasts and throughout skeletal and cardiac myoblast differentiation. Furthermore, expression was differentially downregulated in a lineage-specific manner, suggesting lineage-specific regulation and roles. There was no correlation between mRNA and protein expression for Rbm5, Rbm10v1, and Rbm10v2, suggesting post-transcriptional and/or post-translational regulation. The differentiation expression profiles suggest the products encoded by Rbm5 and Rbm10 play a more important role in skeletal than cardiac myoblast differentiation and influence similar processes in non-tumor, differentiating cells as in transformed cells. The data also suggest that full-length Rbm5 and Rbm10 play a less important role than their alternative splice variants and/or shorter protein isoforms. This work establishes myoblast differentiation as a relevant model in which to conduct functional studies regarding Rbm5 and Rbm10.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive type of lung cancer, with almost 95% of patients succumbing to the disease. Although RBM5, a tumor suppressor gene, is downregulated in the majority of lung cancers, its role in SCLC is unknown. Using the GLC20 SCLC cell line, which has a homozygous deletion encompassing the RBM5 gene locus, we established stable RBM5 expressing sublines and investigated the effects of RBM5 re-expression. Transcriptome and target identification studies determined that RBM5 directly regulates the cell cycle and apoptosis in SCLC cells, as well as significantly downregulates other important transformation-associated pathways such as angiogenesis and cell adhesion. RNA sequencing of paired non-tumor and tumor SCLC patient specimens showed decreased RBM5 expression in the tumors, and expression alterations in the majority of the same pathways that were altered in the GLC20 cells and sublines. Functional studies confirmed RBM5 expression slows SCLC cell line growth, and increases sensitivity to the chemotherapy drug cisplatin. Overall, our work demonstrates the importance of RBM5 expression to the non-transformed state of lung cells and the consequences of its deletion to SCLC development and progression.