BackgroundResearch positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations.MethodsForty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions.ResultsNine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors.ConclusionsThe present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A unique opportunity to engage in research capacity-building strategies for health practitioners arose within public sector health services during the negotiations for an industrial agreement. A research capacity-building initiative for health practitioners that is allied health, oral health and scientist practitioners was funded and the components of this initiative are described. The initiative was implemented using a research capacity-building framework developed from a review of the literature and stakeholder consultations. The framework included leadership and governance, support to researchers and translation of evidence into practice and was contextualised to public health environments. There were several phases of implementation. An evaluation of the preliminary phase of establishing research positions and research activity was conducted and several successes of the capacity-building strategies were identified. These successes (e.g. solid partnerships with universities) are discussed, as are future concerns, such as sustainability of the initiative in a tighter fiscal context.

The greatest contribution to oral fluid intake was from food, not beverages. Designing menus and food services that promote and encourage the enjoyment of fluid dense foods, in contrast to thickened beverages, may present an important way to improve fluid intakes of those with dysphagia. Supplemental enteral or parenteral fluid may be necessary to achieve minimum calculated fluid requirements.

Aim: Information on attitudes and knowledge of practising dietitians regarding the Nutrition Care Process (NCP) and International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT) would be useful to inform effective implementation. The present study aimed to: (i) explore dietitians\u27 expectations, perceptions and anticipated benefits of NCP/IDNT pre and post implementation; (ii) identify perceived implementation barriers and enablers; and (iii) develop and assess a train-the-trainer NCP/IDNT implementation approach. Methods: All Queensland Government State hospitals from metropolitan, regional and remote areas were included in the study. Dietitian champions (n = 17) attended one face-to-face, train-the-trainer day, then led 14 one-hour educational sessions to 279 district dietitians tailored to local situations, facilities and resources. NCP/IDNT were embedded into local processes and chart audits completed. Pre-/post-implementation surveys were completed by 86 dietitians. Results: Pre-implementation results showed positive attitudes regarding the value of NCP/IDNT (mean 1.89, SD 0.67, 1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree). Dietitians identified management support; practice, tutorials and workshops; mentor support; and follow up audits as important for successful implementation. Most attendees (81%) completed ≥10/13 tutorials and 86% (415/480) of audited charts included Nutritional Diagnosis statements. Post-implementation familiarity, confidence and knowledge of NCPT (Nutrition Care Process Terminology) significantly improved (P \u3c 0.001). Conclusions: Prior to implementation, respondents viewed the NCP/IDNT as applicable to their practice areas. The train-the-trainer program with frequent teleconference and email support was effective in improving knowledge, confidence, preparedness for implementing NCPT and charting behaviour. Although training was positively received and has achieved good results, dietitians identified the need for ongoing training and support to further increase confidence following implementation