Objective To present a new principle for correction of the sagittal plane of the spine through the convergent or divergent placement of monoaxial pedicle screws in this plane, associated with compression or distraction, to provide lordotizing or kyphotizing leverage force. Method A statistical mechanical study of twenty-eight fixations in synthetic spine segments was performed. In fifteen pieces, pedicle screws were applied to the ends of the segments with positioning convergent to the center of the fixation. They were attached to the straight rods and subjected to compression force. The other thirteen segments were fixed with pedicle screws in a direction divergent to the center of the fixation, attached to the straight rods, and subjected to distraction force. Results To create kyphosis in the 15 synthetic segments of the spine, the mean pre-fixation Cobb angle was - 0.7° and the mean post-fixation angle was +15°. To create lordosis in the 13 segments, the mean pre-fixation Cobb angle was +1° and the mean post-fixation angle was +18°. The difference was confirmed by statistical mechanical tests and considered significant. However, there is no relevant difference between the mean angles for lordosis and kyphosis formation. Conclusions It was concluded that the correction of the sagittal plane of the spine by applying the new instrumentation method is efficient. A statistical mechanical test confirmed that the difference in Cobb degrees between pre- and post-fixation of the synthetic spine segments was considered significant in the creation of both kyphosis and lordosis. Level of evidence II C; Statistical mechanical study of synthetic spine segments.
Objective: To conduct a comparative study of the results obtained in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with different types of fixations (traditional, selective and multiple), and to evaluate the correction of angular deformity in the frontal plane by the Cobb and sacral clavicular angle (SCA) methods. Methods: A study of a group of 278 patients with AIS who underwent selective, traditional, and multiple fixation surgeries. Results: Significant corrections of both the Cobb angle and the SCA were observed. Conclusions: In the multiple fixation surgeries there was a 100% correction between the preoperative and postoperative SCA values and a 50% correction in the traditional and selective fixations, a difference considered significant. Regarding the Cobb angle, the three fixations presented corrections between preop and postop with significant differences. Level of evidence III; Retrospective Study.
Objective: To create a method to measure the overall coronal plane of the spine, called the sacral clavicular angle (SCA). Methods: A line is drawn at the base of the sacrum; a second central line is drawn perpendicular to the first one in the proximal extension of the spine. A third line is drawn passing through the intersections of the superior points of the clavicles with the two second ribs, forming two angles, the greater of which is measured. Therefore, the degrees exceeding 90° are the SCA values. This tool was tested retrospectively in a study of 46 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent short, apical, single or multiple fixations. Third generation instrumentation was used and the SCA was evaluated in the pre- and postoperative periods, which were compared with another group of 46 patients treated with the traditional technique. Results: Patients submitted to the traditional fixation method presented a median SCA of 3° in the preoperative period, and in the postoperative period, the SCA remained in 3°. Therefore, there was a 0% reduction. Patients submitted to short, apical, single or multiple fixation method presented a median preoperative SCA of 6°, and a postoperative median SCA of 1°, a reduction of approximately 83%. Conclusions: The group treated with short, apical, single or multiple instrumentation presented a reduction in the SCA of approximately 83% in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period. The difference between preoperative and postoperative values was considered statistically significant. Level of Evidence II; Retrospective study.
Objective: To create a new instrumentation principle for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and similar conditions. Methods: A new fixation format was created for the treatment of AIS using 3rd generation instrumentation in short, apical and single or multiple fixations. In patients presenting one scoliotic curve, one fixation is performed. In patients with two curves, two fixations are performed, and in those with three curves, three fixations are performed. To evaluate the new method, a retrospective study of 54 patients who had already undergone surgery for AIS and similar conditions using this innovation was conducted. Results: In this series, average corrections of 72% in the proximal curve, of 83% in the thoracic curve, and of 85% in the thoracolumbar curve were verified. Conclusions: It was concluded that the new fixation principle in the treatment of AIS and similar conditions using short, apical and multiple fixations presented excellent correction, better still in the curves that were more distal in relation to the spine. There was a significant statistical difference between the percentages of curvature correction. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective study.
Objective: To create a new comprehensive, three-dimensional, applicable classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and similar conditions. Methods: The Three-Dimensional Classification was created with three components: the first, the quantitative factor, divides into three types according to the number of curves; the second, the locator factor defines the most structured point of the curve; and the third, the sagittal factor, evaluates the overall sagittal plane. To test the new classification, we studied the images of 99 patients comparing the intra- and interobserver agreement and reproducibility index of the Three-Dimensional Classification with that of Lenke. Results: It can be stated that, overall, the agreement between the three evaluators in relation to the Three-Dimensional Classification and that of Lenke in this series was considered very good. Conclusions: The case study showed a significant difference in the percentages between the two Classifications. In the evaluation of thoracic kyphosis, the Three-Dimensional Classification defined 26.6% of the cases as hyperkyphosis and 61.6% as normal, whereas the Lenke Classification defined 6.06% as hyperkyphosis and 84.18% as normal. However, in the global comparative analysis of the methods, the Three-Dimensional and Lenke systems presented statistically the same levels of agreement, since the values of the confidence intervals overlap. Level of Evidence II; Retrospective study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.