Objective: To create a new instrumentation principle for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and similar conditions. Methods: A new fixation format was created for the treatment of AIS using 3rd generation instrumentation in short, apical and single or multiple fixations. In patients presenting one scoliotic curve, one fixation is performed. In patients with two curves, two fixations are performed, and in those with three curves, three fixations are performed. To evaluate the new method, a retrospective study of 54 patients who had already undergone surgery for AIS and similar conditions using this innovation was conducted. Results: In this series, average corrections of 72% in the proximal curve, of 83% in the thoracic curve, and of 85% in the thoracolumbar curve were verified. Conclusions: It was concluded that the new fixation principle in the treatment of AIS and similar conditions using short, apical and multiple fixations presented excellent correction, better still in the curves that were more distal in relation to the spine. There was a significant statistical difference between the percentages of curvature correction. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective study.
Objective: To create a new comprehensive, three-dimensional, applicable classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and similar conditions. Methods: The Three-Dimensional Classification was created with three components: the first, the quantitative factor, divides into three types according to the number of curves; the second, the locator factor defines the most structured point of the curve; and the third, the sagittal factor, evaluates the overall sagittal plane. To test the new classification, we studied the images of 99 patients comparing the intra- and interobserver agreement and reproducibility index of the Three-Dimensional Classification with that of Lenke. Results: It can be stated that, overall, the agreement between the three evaluators in relation to the Three-Dimensional Classification and that of Lenke in this series was considered very good. Conclusions: The case study showed a significant difference in the percentages between the two Classifications. In the evaluation of thoracic kyphosis, the Three-Dimensional Classification defined 26.6% of the cases as hyperkyphosis and 61.6% as normal, whereas the Lenke Classification defined 6.06% as hyperkyphosis and 84.18% as normal. However, in the global comparative analysis of the methods, the Three-Dimensional and Lenke systems presented statistically the same levels of agreement, since the values of the confidence intervals overlap. Level of Evidence II; Retrospective study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.