Background: Numerous strategies exist for pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with a fast recovery and early ambulation required for full function. Currently, there is no universal standard of care to facilitate this management. We assessed pain management safety and efficacy after TKA, using intra-articular infiltration associated with peripheral saphenous nerve block (SNB) vs intra-articular infiltration alone. Methods: We performed a controlled, double-blinded, and randomized trial to evaluate postoperative pain in TKA. One group was treated with intra-articular analgesia associated with SNB, whereas a second group received the same intra-articular cocktail, associated with placebo. Efficacy was evaluated according to average pain, pain-free time, and morphine rescue indices. Safety was assessed by intervention complications and surgery. Results: About 70 patients were recruited. At time 0 (immediately postoperative), 51.43% of the intraarticular analgesia þ placebo group presented pain <3, whereas in the intra-articular analgesia þ SNB group, 8.82% (P ¼ .001) presented with pain. This difference was maintained at 6, 12, and 24 hours, postoperatively. After 24 hours, the placebo group received an average 0.66 morphine rescues (standard deviation, 0.86), when compared with the SNB group that received 0.14 rescues (standard deviation, 0.43), (P ¼ .002). We recorded a paresis of the external popliteal sciatic nerve, with spontaneous recovery without other complications. Conclusion: Complementary SNB to intra-articular analgesia was more effective in reducing average pain and the amount of pain-free time in the first 24 hours after TKA, with fewer requests for morphine rescue analgesia.
We determined the midterm survival, incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and the enhancement of the width of the femur when combining struts and impacted bone allografts in 24 patients (25 hips) with severe femoral bone loss who underwent revision hip surgery. The pre-operative diagnosis was aseptic loosening in 16 hips, second-stage reconstruction in seven, peri-prosthetic fracture in one and stem fracture in one hip. A total of 14 hips presented with an Endoklinik grade 4 defect and 11 hips a grade 3 defect. The mean pre-operative Merle D'Aubigné and Postel score was 5.5 points (1 to 8). The survivorship was 96% (95% confidence interval 72 to 98) at a mean of 54.5 months (36 to 109). The mean functional score was 17.3 points (16 to 18). One patient in which the strut did not completely bypass the femoral defect was further revised using a long cemented stem due to peri-prosthetic fracture at six months post-operatively. The mean subsidence of the stem was 1.6 mm (1 to 3). There was no evidence of osteolysis, resorption or radiolucencies during follow-up in any hip. Femoral width was enhanced by a mean of 41% (19% to 82%). A total of 24 hips had partial or complete bridging of the strut allografts. This combined biological method was associated with a favourable survivorship, a low incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture and enhancement of the width of the femur in revision total hip replacement in patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss.
Septic arthritis due to
Listeria monocytogenes
(LM) is extremely rare and most infections due to this organism are seen in immunocompromised patients. We describe a patient without immunological compromise, with a late total knee arthroplasty infection caused by LM treated with one-stage revision surgery. She had an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (79 mm/h) and C-reactive protein (13 mg/dL). Aspiration of the knee joint yielded purulent fluid; cultures showed LM. The patient was given 6 weeks of intravenous ampicillin, followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and finally amoxicillin orally for 7 months. Two years after revision surgery, radiographs showed no evidence of implant loosening. This is a single case and although one-stage approach seemed to have worked, it should not be recommended on the basis of a single report.
A case of a 3-cm acoustic neurinoma totally excised with preservation of the facial and cochlear nerves is reported. Hearing was not impaired by the operation, but dramatically improved within 2 months. The literature on operations of acoustic tumors with preservation of hearing is reviewed. In patients with some hearing ability, the operation should be conservative, whatever the size of the neurinoma, because there is a fair chance of success.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.