The essay examines the reception of Gerhard Richter in a range of his torical writing and exhibitions both in and outside Germany. Drawing on critical theories of reception, it is argued that the history of Richter's oeuvre is created as much by the artist himself-who actively controls the construct of his oeuvre-as by curators, critics, scholars, and biograph 186 Julia Gelshorn interest in German postwar art in relation to historical trauma. With the biographical turn, certain works by Richter became the subjects of almost contradictory narratives and stories and ultimately, deceptive witnesses of an exemplary German history.
Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit. Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.