Abstract. Microscopic examination of blood smears remains the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, but is laborintensive and requires skilled operators. Rapid dipstick technology provides a potential alternative. A study was conducted in The Gambia to compare the performance of OptiMAL, an immunochromatographic antigen detection assay for the diagnosis of malaria using parasite lactate dehydrogenase, against standard microscopy in patients with suspected malaria. For initial diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum, irrespective of stage, this assay had a sensitivity of 91.3%, a specificity of 92%, a positive predictive value of 87.2%, and a negative predictive value of 94.7%. The sensitivity of the test decreased markedly at parasitemias Ͻ 0.01%. This assay can be used for the diagnosis of malaria in areas where microscopy is not available and for urgent malaria diagnosis at night and at weekends, when routine laboratories are closed and when relatively inexperienced microscopists may be on duty.
Background: Transfusion-transmitted Chagas disease has been reported from endemic countries in Latin America. Switzerland is a non-endemic country but high prevalence of antibodies against Trypanosoma cruzi was found among immigrants. Immigrants may participate in blood donation; therefore, risk-adapted anti-T. cruzi screening for blood donors was implemented in Switzerland in 2013. Methods: Between January 2013 and July 2015, 1 out of 1,183 at-risk donors, tested at Blood Transfusion Service Zurich, was found anti-T. cruzi IgG-positive. Results and Conclusion: Out of 54 donations given by the index donor (ID), we identified 77 blood products which were delivered to hospitals. Archived serum samples from the donations given during the prior 5 years were available for retrospective testing. All samples from ID revealed positive findings for anti-T.cruzi IgG. Donor-triggered look-back procedure identified a 70-year-old male recipient of a platelet concentrate (PC) donated by ID. The recipient succumbed of acute T. cruzi infection 2 years after transfusion of the PC.
Results of genotyping with true high-throughput capability for MNSs antigens are underrepresented, probably because of technical issues, due to the high level of nucleotide sequence homology of the paralogous genes GYPA, GYPB and GYPE. Eight MNSs-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were detected using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in 5800 serologically M/N and S/s pre-typed Swiss blood donors and 50 individuals of known or presumptive black African ethnicity. Comparison of serotype with genotype delivered concordance rates of 99·70% and 99·90% and accuracy of genotyping alone of 99·88% and 99·95%, for M/N and S/s, respectively. The area under the curve of peak signals was measured in intron 1 of the two highly homologous genes GYPB and GYPE and allowed for gene copy number variation estimates in all individuals investigated. Elevated GYPB:GYPE ratios accumulated in several carriers of two newly observed GYP*401 variants, termed type G and H, both encoding for the low incidence antigen St(a). In black Africans, reduced GYPB gene contents were proven in pre-typed S-s-U- phenotypes and could be reproduced in unknown specimens. Quantitative gene copy number estimates represented a highly attractive supplement to conventional genotyping, solely based on MNSs SNPs.
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Screening of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and individual-donation nucleic acid amplification testing (ID-NAT) of blood donors have become standard to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, there is still a residual risk of HBV transmission by blood components of donors suffering from occult HBV infection (OBI). Therefore, many countries implemented universal testing of anti-HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) antibodies in order to increase blood safety. In Switzerland, anti-HBc testing is not part of the routine blood donor-screening repertoire. Therefore, we sought to assess prevalence of donors with OBI in a Swiss blood donor collective. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Blood donations were prospectively investigated for the presence of anti-HBc antibodies during two time periods (I: all donors, March 2017; II: first-time donors only, April 2017 until February 2018). Anti-HBc-positive findings were confirmed by an anti-HBc neutralization test. Discarded plasma samples of anti-HBc-confirmed positive donors were ultracentrifuged and subsequently retested by regular HBV-ID-NAT to search for traces of HBV. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During time period I, 78 (1.6%) individuals out of 4,923 donors were confirmed anti-HBc-positive. Sixty-nine (88%) anti-HBc-positive samples were available and processed by ultracentrifugation followed by repeat HBV-ID-NAT. Four samples (5.8%) were found positive for HBV DNA. Sixty-five (94.2%) samples remained HBV NAT-negative upon ultracentrifugation. During time period II, 56 (0.9%) donor samples out of 6,509 exhibited anti-HBc-confirmed positive. Fifty-five (98%) samples could be reassessed by HBV-ID-NAT upon ultracentrifugation. Three (5.5%) samples contained HBV DNA and 52 (94.5%) samples remained HBV NAT-negative. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Overall, we detected 7 viremic OBI carriers among 11,432 blood donors, which tested negative for HBV by standard HBV-ID-NAT and HBsAg screening. In contrast, OBI carriers showed positive anti-HBc findings which could be confirmed in 83.8% of the cases. Thus, OBI might be missed by the current HBV screening process of Swiss blood donors. We suggest to review current HBV screening algorithm. Extended donor screening by anti-HBc testing may unmask OBI carriers and contribute to blood safety for the recipient of blood products.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.