This study examined the temporal stability of the measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) in 813 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Participants completed the CES-D (Radloff, 1977) on three occasions 1 year apart. Structural equation models and polyserial correlations were used to address methodological limitations of previous studies. Four competing measurement structures were tested with one factor, three factors, four factors, and a single second-order factor underlying the four-factor model. The four-factor and the second-order-factor models provided the best fit at Time 1. When cross-validated at Times 2 and 3, the four-factor and the second-order-factor models remained invariant. Researchers can now more confidently use the CES-D to examine how distress changes in chronic physical disorders.
In a sample of 92 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, we examined interrelations among various control appraisals, illness predictability, psychosocial adjustment, mood, and illness status. Perceiving greater personal control over the disease and symptoms and perceiving greater health-care-provider control over symptoms were associated with greater illness predictability. Patients reported more personal control over their symptoms than over the course of the disease and thought that their health care providers had more control over disease course than they did themselves. Multiple regression analyses showed that perceiving greater personal control over one's medical care and treatment was associated with positive mood and psychosocial adjustment. Negative mood was also associated with the belief that providers have greater control over the patient's daily symptoms. Patients who had a more severe disease and expressed greater personal control over its course reported greater mood disturbance and were rated as exhibiting less positive adjustment, but those who had more severe daily symptoms and expressed greater personal control over their symptoms reported less mood disturbance. These findings are discussed in terms of the possible benefits of patients' active participation in their care and the implications of perceiving personal and others' control over more or less controllable aspects of the illness, especially when the illness is more severe.
Objective. To evaluate regression models that include social, attitudinal, work structure, health status, and family characteristics, with regard to their prediction of work disability in a national sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods. Four hundred ninety-eight employed RA patients were recruited from a national sample of private rheumatology practices. Three hundred ninetytwo remained in the study after 5 years. Data were collected from patients by telephone interview, and patients' physicians provided written clinical assessments. Only variables on which information was obtained in year 1 were used to predict work status in year 5, using hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis.Results. The significant predictors of work disability were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04), number of deformed joints (OR 1.26), number of joints with flare (OR 1.23), the complexity of working with things at work (OR 0.88), and the desire to remain employed (OR 2.3). The risk of work disability increased with increasing age, more severe disease, greater complexity of involvement with things at work, reduced work hours, and desire to not be working outside the home.Conclusion. The risk of becoming work disabled in 5 years was predicted more by clinical status at entry into the study than by work structure.
Correlates of selective comparisons by mothers of high-risk infants and individuals with rheumatoid arthritis showed that mothers were especially likely to make downward comparisons. Arthritis patients making downward comparisons were rated by their health care providers as more positively adjusted, independent of actual severity of illness. Implications for support providers are discussed.
This study examined the association between history of depression and day-to-day coping with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain. The sample was 188 RA-diagnosed participants, 73 of whom were identified by a structured clinical interview as having a history of major depression. None had current major depression. All participated in a 30-day prospective study in which they made end-of-day ratings of their arthritis pain, the strategies for how they coped with their pain, their appraisals of daily pain, and daily mood. Hierarchical linear models evaluated whether individuals with and without depression history differed in their average pain and the other daily measures; and separately, whether they differed in their within-person associations between pain and the daily measures (e.g., the day-to-day contingency between pain and mood). All analyses controlled for current mild depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and age. Previously depressed individuals were indistinguishable from their never depressed peers in their average pain and the other daily measures; however, the previously depressed exhibited significantly stronger associations between pain and several aspects of their daily emotional experience, suggesting more pain-contingent well-being. For individuals with a history of depression, increases in daily pain corresponded with more frequent efforts to cope with their pain by venting their emotions, significantly stronger impairments in mood, and, if they were also presently distressed, reduced perceptions of control over their pain, compared to the never depressed. Patterns suggest that formerly depressed individuals exhibit a hidden vulnerability in how they manage chronic pain. This vulnerability is best revealed by a daily process approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.