The advent of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) genome editing, coupled with advances in computing and imaging capabilities, has initiated a new era in which genetic diseases and individual disease susceptibilities are both predictable and actionable. Likewise, genes responsible for plant traits can be identified and altered quickly, transforming the pace of agricultural research and plant breeding. In this Review, we discuss the current state of CRISPR-mediated genetic manipulation in human cells, animals, and plants along with relevant successes and challenges and present a roadmap for the future of this technology.
CRISPR-Cas immunity requires integration of short, foreign DNA fragments into the host genome at the CRISPR locus, a site consisting of alternating repeat sequences and foreign-derived spacers. In most CRISPR systems, the proteins Cas1 and Cas2 form the integration complex and are both essential for DNA acquisition. Most type V-C and V-D systems lack the cas2 gene and have unusually short CRISPR repeats and spacers. Here, we show that a miniintegrase comprising the type V-C Cas1 protein alone catalyzes DNA integration with a preference for short (17-to 19-base-pair) DNA fragments. The mini-integrase has weak specificity for the CRISPR array. We present evidence that the Cas1 proteins form a tetramer for integration. Our findings support a model of a minimal integrase with an internal ruler mechanism that favors shorter repeats and spacers. This minimal integrase may represent the function of the ancestral Cas1 prior to Cas2 adoption.
CRISPR-Cas systems provide adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea, beginning with integration of foreign sequences into the host CRISPR genomic locus and followed by transcription and maturation of CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs). In some CRISPR systems, a reverse transcriptase (RT) fusion to the Cas1 integrase and Cas6 maturase creates a single protein that enables concerted sequence integration and crRNA production. To elucidate how the RT-integrase organizes distinct enzymatic activities, we present the cryo-EM structure of a Cas6-RT-Cas1—Cas2 CRISPR integrase complex. The structure reveals a heterohexamer in which the RT directly contacts the integrase and maturase domains, suggesting functional coordination between all three active sites. Together with biochemical experiments, our data support a model of sequential enzymatic activities that enable CRISPR sequence acquisition from RNA and DNA substrates. These findings highlight an expanded capacity of some CRISPR systems to acquire diverse sequences that direct CRISPR-mediated interference.
Survival from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other dementias into late old age may be a useful phenotype for genetic studies of successful cognitive aging. To support molecular genetics studies for successful cognitive aging, we conducted a two-stage study to determine an optimal age phenotype for successful cognitive aging. First, risk of AD was evaluated, through informant interviews, in 4,794 parents and siblings of 976 elderly nondemented probands who were divided into three different proband age groups: those aged 60-74, 75-89, and 90+. Relatives of probands aged 90+ had a significantly lower risk than the relatives of the other two proband groups. Second, this sample was combined with an earlier sample (combined nondemented elderly probands: n = 2,025; relatives: n = 10,506), and a series of proband age groups (i.e., 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+) were used to determine which optimally identifies a group of relatives with low AD risk. Using the relatives of the nondemented proband aged 60-74 as the reference group, there were reductions in cumulative risk among relatives of probands aged 85-89 and 90+, but only the latter group also showed significant reductions to the relatives of probands aged 75-79, 80-84, and 85-89. This pattern of results varied little by sex. Finally, cumulative AD risk curves were similar between relatives of probands aged 90-94 and 95+. These results suggest that age 90 is an optimal age threshold to use for both men and women in genetic studies seeking to identify genes associated with successful cognitive aging.
CRISPR–Cas adaptive immune systems capture DNA fragments from invading mobile genetic elements and integrate them into the host genome to provide a template for RNA-guided immunity1. CRISPR systems maintain genome integrity and avoid autoimmunity by distinguishing between self and non-self, a process for which the CRISPR/Cas1–Cas2 integrase is necessary but not sufficient2–5. In some microorganisms, the Cas4 endonuclease assists CRISPR adaptation6,7, but many CRISPR–Cas systems lack Cas48. Here we show here that an elegant alternative pathway in a type I-E system uses an internal DnaQ-like exonuclease (DEDDh) to select and process DNA for integration using the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). The natural Cas1–Cas2/exonuclease fusion (trimmer-integrase) catalyses coordinated DNA capture, trimming and integration. Five cryo-electron microscopy structures of the CRISPR trimmer-integrase, visualized both before and during DNA integration, show how asymmetric processing generates size-defined, PAM-containing substrates. Before genome integration, the PAM sequence is released by Cas1 and cleaved by the exonuclease, marking inserted DNA as self and preventing aberrant CRISPR targeting of the host. Together, these data support a model in which CRISPR systems lacking Cas4 use fused or recruited9,10 exonucleases for faithful acquisition of new CRISPR immune sequences.
CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems capture DNA fragments from invading mobile genetic elements and integrate them into the host genome to provide a template for RNA-guided immunity. CRISPR systems maintain genome integrity and avoid autoimmunity by distinguishing between self and non-self, a process for which the CRISPR-Cas1:Cas2 integrase is necessary but not sufficient. In some microbes, the Cas4 endonuclease assists CRISPR adaptation, but many CRISPR-Cas systems lack Cas4. We show here that an elegant alternative pathway employs an internal exonuclease to select and process DNA for integration using the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). A natural Cas1:Cas2-exonuclease fusion (trimmer-integrase) catalyzes coordinated DNA capture, trimming and integration. Five cryo-EM structures of the CRISPR trimmer-integrase, visualized both before and during DNA integration, show how asymmetric processing generates size-defined, PAM-containing substrates. Before genome integration, the PAM sequence is released by Cas1 and cleaved by the exonuclease, marking inserted DNA as self and preventing aberrant CRISPR targeting of the host. Together, these data support a model in which CRISPR systems lacking Cas4 use fused or recruited exonucleases for faithful acquisition of new CRISPR immune sequences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.