Background Treatment of the bleeding disorder von Willebrand disease (VWD) focuses on increasing von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels by administration of desmopressin or VWF-containing concentrates. Both therapies leave the production of mutant VWF unhindered, which may have additional consequences, such as thrombocytopenia in patients with VWD type 2B, competition between mutant and normal VWF for platelet receptors, and the potential development of intestinal angiodysplasia. Most cases of VWD are caused by dominant-negative mutations in VWF, and we hypothesize that diminishing expression of mutant VWF positively affects VWD phenotypes. Objectives To investigate allele-specific inhibition of VWF by applying small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VWF. This approach allows allele-specific knockdown irrespective of the mutations causing VWD. Methods Four SNPs with a high predicted heterozygosity within VWF were selected, and siRNAs were designed against both alleles of the four SNPs. siRNA efficiency, allele specificity and siRNA-mediated phenotypic improvements were determined in VWF-expressing HEK293 cells. Results Twelve siRNAs were able to efficiently inhibit single VWF alleles in HEK293 cells that stably produce VWF. Transient cotransfections of these siRNAs with two VWF alleles resulted in a clear preference for the targeted allele over the untargeted allele for 11 siRNAs. We also demonstrated siRNA-mediated phenotypic improvement of the VWF multimerization pattern of the VWD type 2A mutation VWF p.Cys2773Ser. Conclusions Allele-specific siRNAs are able to distinguish VWF alleles on the basis of one nucleotide variation, and are able to improve a severe multimerization defect caused by VWF p.Cys2773Ser. This holds promise for the therapeutic application of allele-specific siRNAs in dominant-negative VWD.

Summary Maternal alloantibodies directed against fetal red blood cell (RBC) antigens may cause potentially life‐threatening haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Dutch transfusion guidelines therefore prescribe preventive cEK matching for all (pre‐)fertile females. To quantify the impact of cEK matching, we compared overall and antigen‐specific cumulative RBC alloimmunisation incidences in females and males aged <45 years. Among a multicentre cohort comprised of patients who received their first and subsequent RBC unit between 2005 and 2019, first‐formed RBC alloantibodies were detected in 47 of 2998 (1·6%) females and 49 of 2507 (2·0%) males. Comparing females and males, overall alloimmunisation incidences were comparable (3·1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2·1–4·4] versus 3·5% (95% CI 2·4–4·9, P = 0·853) after 10 units transfused). However, cEK alloimmunisation incidences were significantly lower among females (0·6% (95% CI 0·3–1.5) versus 2·2% (95% CI 1·5–3·4, P = 0·001) after 10 units transfused). Yet, despite cEK‐matching guidelines being in effect, 6·5%, 3·6% and 0·2% of all RBC units remained mismatched for c, E or K antigens respectively. Most of these mismatches were almost always due to emergency settings. Even though cEK alloimmunisation was not prevented completely, implementation of cEK matching resulted in an alloantigen‐exposure risk reduction of up to 98%.

Background Renal failure and renal replacement therapy (RRT) affect the immune system and could therefore modulate red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization after transfusion. Study Design and Methods We performed a nationwide multicenter case‐control study within a source population of newly transfused patients between 2005 and 2015. Using conditional multivariate logistic regression, we compared first‐time transfusion‐induced RBC alloantibody formers (N = 505) with two nonalloimmunized recipients with similar transfusion burden (N = 1010). Results Renal failure was observed in 17% of the control and 13% of the case patients. A total of 41% of the control patients and 34% of case patients underwent acute RRT. Renal failure without RRT was associated with lower alloimmunization risks after blood transfusion (moderate renal failure: adjusted relative rate [RR], 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67‐1.01]); severe renal failure, adjusted RR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.55‐1.05]). With severe renal failure patients mainly receiving RRT, the lowest alloimmunization risk was found in particularly these patients [adjusted RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.39‐0.58)]. This was similar for patients receiving RRT for acute or chronic renal failure (adjusted RR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.46‐0.75]); and adjusted RR, 0.62 [95% CI 0.45‐0.88], respectively). Conclusion These findings are indicative of a weakened humoral response in acute as well as chronic renal failure, which appeared to be most pronounced when treated with RRT. Future research should focus on how renal failure and RRT mechanistically modulate RBC alloimmunization.