The drive for continuously improving the performance and increasing the efficiencies of marine transportation has resulted in the development of a new alloy, Mercalloy A362™. This alloy was designed to lighten Mercury Marine’s lower transmission gearcase while also improving the alloy’s recyclability. The new prototype gearcase was subjected to Mercury Marine’s standard service conditions, which resulted in the premature failure of the prototype. A previous study revealed that a large accumulation of unwanted residual stress (~120 MPa) was present in the gearcase following the high pressure die casting process. Fortunately, the T5 heat treatment reduced the magnitude of stress by approximately 50%. However, the effects that the T5 heat treatment had on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the alloy were not discussed. Thus, this research article characterizes the effects that the T5 heat treatment has on the volume fraction and morphology of the intermetallics, as well as the tensile performance of the alloy. It was found that the T5 heat treatment led to only minor increases in the volume fraction of Fe-bearing intermetallics, leading to similar tensile properties in both the as-cast and T5 condition. These results suggest that the T5 heat treatment can alleviate residual stress without significantly altering the mechanical properties of the alloy. The results from the previous stress analysis and the current study were used to optimize the manufacturing process which led to the successful introduction of the gearcase into the competitive marine industry.
Residual stress is one of the main reasons for failure of automotive cylinder blocks and engine heads. These failures are typically associated with in-service distortion or cracking occurring in engines during operation cycles. The problem becomes more pronounced for engines that are running at elevated operating pressures and temperatures, limiting R&D options in developing and implementing higher-efficiency engines. New aluminum alloys and manufacturing methods have been introduced with varying degree of success, in many cases affected by the stress magnitudes and stress distribution in the component. Therefore, active research is ongoing internationally on finding the most reliable methods of stress analysis as a basis for developing efficient methods for stress mitigation. The current study presents a comparison between two experimental strain measurements techniques: a destructive method that is based on application of strain gauge sensors, and a non-destructive method using neutron diffraction. The results indicate that although the strain gauge method provides an indication of the nature (i.e. compression or tension) of strain within a component, this method should primarily be used for surface measurements and qualitative analyses only. Neutron diffraction remains the superior technique for strain analysis, particularly for engineering components with complex geometries. The results from this study provide the transportation industry with a more comprehensive understanding of the efficacy of utilizing strain gauge sensors, neutron diffraction or finite element modelling for measuring the residual strain in cast components. The results will help manufacturers to develop the next generation of powertrain systems with increased efficiency and improved performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.