The Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) task is a performance test of therapists’ use of common relational skills (e.g. empathy, building expectations). The FIS method includes (a) materials that simulate difficult client moments on video, which are used to collect therapists’ responses to these situations; and (b) independent ratings of these responses. Many of the FIS items are informed by psychotherapy processes that have been linked to outcome and facilitative conditions that have been reframed as individual therapist skills (e.g. alliance bond capacity). Overall, the FIS has predicted psychotherapy outcome. A single study is described in which FIS predicted the therapist effect using multilevel modelling of a large sample of clients who were nested within therapists. We also summarise two additional outcome studies that used experimental designs. One future direction is to better understand how therapists form responses to these difficult moments. We conclude that forming an optimal therapeutic response during challenging, emergent in‐session situations involves responsiveness (Stiles et al., 1998), or finding a response that fits the clients’ needs within any moment.

For a wide range of phenomena, current computational ability does not always allow for fully atomistic simulations of high-dimensional molecular systems to reach time scales of interest. Coarse-graining (CG) is an established approach to alleviate the impact of computational limits while retaining the same algorithms used in atomistic simulations. It is of importance to understand how algorithms such as Langevin integrators perform on nontrivial CG molecular systems, and in particular how large of an integration time step can be used without introducing unacceptable amounts of error into averaged quantities of interest. To investigate this, we examined three different Langevin integrators on a CG polymer melt: the recently developed BAOAB method by Leimkuhler and Matthews [17], the Grønbech-Jensen and Farago method [12], or G-JF, and the frequently used Brünger-Brooks-Karplus integrator [6], also known as BBK. We compute and analyze key statistical properties for each. Our results indicate that the three integrators perform similarly when using a small friction parameter; however, outside of this regime the use of large integration steps produces significant deviations from the predicted diffusivity and steady-state distributions for all integration methods examined with the exception of G-JF.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 82C31; 82C80; 82D15.

In light of the recently developed complete GJ set of single random variable stochastic, discrete-time Størmer–Verlet algorithms for statistically accurate simulations of Langevin equations [N. Grønbech-Jensen, Mol. Phys. 118, e1662506 (2020)], we investigate two outstanding questions: (1) Are there any algorithmic or statistical benefits from including multiple random variables per time step and (2) are there objective reasons for using one or more methods from the available set of statistically correct algorithms? To address the first question, we assume a general form for the discrete-time equations with two random variables and then follow the systematic, brute-force GJ methodology by enforcing correct thermodynamics in linear systems. It is concluded that correct configurational Boltzmann sampling of a particle in a harmonic potential implies correct configurational free-particle diffusion and that these requirements only can be accomplished if the two random variables per time step are identical. We consequently submit that the GJ set represents all possible stochastic Størmer–Verlet methods that can reproduce time step-independent statistics of linear systems. The second question is thus addressed within the GJ set. Based on numerical simulations of complex molecular systems, as well as on analytic considerations, we analyze apparent friction-induced differences in the stability of the methods. We attribute these differences to an inherent, friction-dependent discrete-time scaling, which depends on the specific method. We suggest that the method with the simplest interpretation of temporal scaling, the GJ-I/GJF-2GJ method, be preferred for statistical applications.

In light of the recently published complete set of statistically correct Grønbech–Jensen (GJ) methods for discrete-time thermodynamics, we revise a differential operator splitting method for the Langevin equation in order to comply with the basic GJ thermodynamic sampling features, namely, the Boltzmann distribution and Einstein diffusion, in linear systems. This revision, which is based on the introduction of time scaling along with flexibility of a discrete-time velocity attenuation parameter, provides a direct link between the ABO splitting formalism and the GJ methods. This link brings about the conclusion that any GJ method has at least weak second order accuracy in the applied time step. It further helps identify a novel half-step velocity, which simultaneously produces both correct kinetic statistics and correct transport measures for any of the statistically sound GJ methods. Explicit algorithmic expressions are given for the integration of the new half-step velocity into the GJ set of methods. Numerical simulations, including quantum-based molecular dynamics (QMD) using the QMD suite Los Alamos Transferable Tight-Binding for Energetics, highlight the discussed properties of the algorithms as well as exhibit the direct application of robust, time-step-independent stochastic integrators to QMD.

No abstract