2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0066008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing discrete-time Langevin splitting methods into agreement with thermodynamics

Abstract: In light of the recently published complete set of statistically correct Grønbech–Jensen (GJ) methods for discrete-time thermodynamics, we revise a differential operator splitting method for the Langevin equation in order to comply with the basic GJ thermodynamic sampling features, namely, the Boltzmann distribution and Einstein diffusion, in linear systems. This revision, which is based on the introduction of time scaling along with flexibility of a discrete-time velocity attenuation parameter, provides a dir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For γ TC = 0, the algorithm in eq , with the given choice of c L , is a splitting formulation of the method by Grønbech–Jensen and Farago. , In fact, any of the recently derived one-parameter family of thermodynamically exact Grønbech–Jensen (GJ) methods ,, can be written using a similar splitting when an additional time-scaling factor is included. A detailed derivation and theoretical evaluation for the family of GJ integration schemes in splitting form, on which eq is based, is presented in ref . An alternative integration method, again based on this splitting formalism, is given in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Canonical Qmd Simulations Using Tensor Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For γ TC = 0, the algorithm in eq , with the given choice of c L , is a splitting formulation of the method by Grønbech–Jensen and Farago. , In fact, any of the recently derived one-parameter family of thermodynamically exact Grønbech–Jensen (GJ) methods ,, can be written using a similar splitting when an additional time-scaling factor is included. A detailed derivation and theoretical evaluation for the family of GJ integration schemes in splitting form, on which eq is based, is presented in ref . An alternative integration method, again based on this splitting formalism, is given in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Canonical Qmd Simulations Using Tensor Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences are found in, e.g., correlations to the configurational coordinate, r n ; see Eq. (34).…”
Section: Constructing Half-step Velocities With a Single Noise Value ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulations confirm that GSD/BAOA achieves the same high numerical accuracy as BAOAB for configurational properties. We remark that other Langevin integrators have been compared to BAOAB and also found to exhibit similar or equivalent configurational properties. ,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%