The gene pool encoding PRR and NLR immune receptors determines the ability of a plant to resist microbial infections. Basal expression of these genes is prevented by diverse mechanisms since their hyperactivity can be harmful. To approach the study of epigenetic control of PRR/NLR genes we here analyzed their expression in mutants carrying abnormal repressive 5-methyl cytosine (5-mC) and histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) marks, due to lack of MET1, CMT3, MOM1, SUVH4/5/6, or DDM1. At optimal growth conditions, none of the mutants showed basal expression of the defense gene marker PR1, but all of them had greater resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato than wild type plants, suggesting they are primed to stimulate immune cascades. Consistently, analysis of available transcriptomes indicated that all mutants showed activation of particular PRR/NLR genes under some growth conditions. Under low defense activation, 37 PRR/NLR genes were expressed in these plants, but 29 of them were exclusively activated in specific mutants, indicating that MET1, CMT3, MOM1, SUVH4/5/6, and DDM1 mediate basal repression of different subsets of genes. Some epigenetic marks present at promoters, but not gene bodies, could explain the activation of these genes in the mutants. As expected, suvh4/5/6 and ddm1 activated genes carrying 5-mC and H3K9me2 marks in wild type plants. Surprisingly, all mutants expressed genes harboring promoter H2A.Z/H3K27me3 marks likely affected by the chromatin remodeler PIE1 and the histone demethylase REF6, respectively. Therefore, MET1, CMT3, MOM1, SUVH4/5/6, and DDM1, together with REF6, seemingly contribute to the establishment of chromatin states that prevent constitutive PRR/NLR gene activation, but facilitate their priming by modulating epigenetic marks at their promoters.

SUMMARY DNA glycosylases are critical enzymes that recognize small base lesions in DNA and trigger their repair to preserve genome integrity. The Arabidopsis MBD4‐like (MBD4L) DNA glycosylase improves tolerance to genotoxic stress. This enzyme is encoded by a single gene carrying an exonic intron (exitron) at its 5′ region. Although alternative splicing (AS) of exitrons (protein‐coding cryptic introns within exons) is suspected to increase protein diversity, phenotypes associated to exitron removal or retention are only known for a few genes. Here, we show that AS of the MBD4L exitron determines the generation of two enzyme isoforms with different subnuclear localization. Both isoforms conserve the catalytic domain but are directed to either the nucleoplasm or the nucleolus. Interestingly, heat stress regulates the AS of the MBD4L exitron and increases the relative abundance of the nucleolar variant. This process depends on the splicing factors NTR1 and RS31. Next, we generated transgenic plants expressing a mutated MBD4L‐GFP gene version that abolished exitron splicing and found that nucleolar protein targeting was impaired in these plants. Our findings suggest that AS of the MBD4L exitron can function as a mechanism to drive the enzyme to the nucleolus during heat stress. Several DNA repair enzymes reach the nucleolus under particular conditions although AS of exitrons has not been so far associated with this process. To our knowledge, this is the first example of an exitron mediating enzyme localization in eukaryotes.