191Leite crú de quatro regiões leiteras brasileiras: atendimento dos requesitos microbiológicos, Nero et al. 28/12/2004 (001345). Recebido para publicação em 17/05/2004. Aceito para publicação em

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the spread of Salmonella Enteritidis to different cutting boards (wood, triclosan-treated plastic, glass, and stainless steel) from contaminated poultry skin (5 log CFU/g) and then to tomatoes and to analyze the effect of different protocols used to clean these surfaces to control contamination. The following procedures were simulated: (1) no cleaning after handling contaminated poultry skin; (2) rinsing in running water; (3) cleaning with dish soap and mechanical scrubbing; and (4) cleaning with dish soap and mechanical scrubbing, followed by disinfection with hypochlorite. The pathogen was recovered from all surfaces following procedure 1, with counts ranging from 1.90 to 2.80 log, as well as from the tomatoes handled on it. Reduced numbers of S. Enteritidis were recovered using the other procedures, both from the surfaces and from the tomatoes. Counts were undetectable after procedure 4. From all surfaces evaluated, wood was the most difficult to clean, and stainless steel was the easiest. The use of hypochlorite as a disinfecting agent helped to reduce cross-contamination.

Fluctuations in the Brazilian milk market force small milk producers to find temporary trade alternatives, which include selling raw milk to people who prefer this type of milk rather than heat-processed milk. Considering the importance of these small milk producers to the market and the well-known health risks associated to consumption of raw milk, this study evaluated the microbiological quality and the presence of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., chlorine, antimicrobials and insecticides (organophosphates and carbamates) in raw milk produced in 210 small and medium farms located in four important milk-producing Brazilian states (Paraná, São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio Grande do Sul). In 66% of the selected farms the milking was manual. In 33% of them, the milking was semi-automatic, and only 1% were equipped with fully automatic milking systems. All raw milk samples were negative for L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp and chlorine. Mesophilic aerobes counts were higher than 10 5 CFU/ml in 75.7% of the samples. In 80.4%, coliforms were over 10 2 CFU/ml. Escherichia coli was detected in 36.8% of the samples. Insecticides and antimicrobial residues were observed in 74.4% and 11.5% of the samples, respectively. The presence of unacceptable levels of hygiene indicators, insecticides and antimicrobial residues were considered more important risk factors than the two pathogens.

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of multidrug-resistant, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Salmonella spp. isolated from conveyor belts of broiler cutting rooms in Brazilian broiler processing plants. Ninety-eight strains of Salmonella spp. were analyzed. Multidrug resistance was determined by the disk diffusion test and the susceptibility of the isolated bacteria was evaluated against 18 antimicrobials from seven different classes. The double disk diffusion test was used to evaluate ESBL production. Of the 98 strains tested, 84 were multidrug resistant. The highest rates of resistance were against nalidixic acid (95%), tetracycline (91%), and the beta-lactams: ampicillin and cefachlor (45%), followed by streptomycin and gentamicin with 19% and 15% of strain resistance, respectively. By contrast, 97% of the strains were sensitive to chloramphenicol. 45% of the strains were positive for the presence of ESBL activity. In this study, high rates of multidrug resistance and ESBL production were observed in Salmonella spp.

The aims of this study were to analyze the biofilm-producing ability of 98 strains isolated from different surface materials in poultry cutting rooms; to assess the presence of the most important to Salmonella biofilm formation genes adrA and csgD in these strains; and to evaluate the tolerance biofilms formed in polypropylene and polyurethane slides to sanitizers commonly used in the industry. Viable cells were removed from the slides soon after treatment with sanitizers, and then submitted to reincubation for a new count. Only one strain was a strong biofilm-producer in polystyrene; 70% of strains were weak, and 29% were moderate producers. Both genes were found in all strains. There were differences in adhesion to polypropylene and polyurethane, and scanning electron microscopy showed that polyurethane surface was more irregular. No viable cells were recovered in polypropylene slides treated with sanitizers; in polyurethane, reduction in viable cell counts soon after sanitizer treatment was enough to consider that sanitizers were efficient. On the other hand, treatment with peracetic acid was not considered efficient. Results of this study should be considered a food safety warning, due to the importance of the biofilmproducing ability both in vitro and in real poultry processing plants.