Solid pseudopapillary tumor, pancreatoblastoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic-like giant cells, and acinar cell carcinomas are rare pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Compared to the significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in the last decades, the molecular mechanisms underlying pancreatic nonductal neoplasms are poorly understood. In order to elucidate their molecular pathogenesis, we constructed tissue microarrays to study the expression of some novel pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-associated tumor markers in these nonductal pancreatic neoplasms. We analyzed nine markers including tumor suppressor gene (14-3-3 sigma), proliferation marker (topoisomerase II alpha), epithelial markers (prostate stem cell antigen, mesothelin and cytokeratin 19), stromal markers (fascin, hsp47 and fibronectin), and gamma-synuclein whose function is not delineated. In addition, we included tumor suppressor gene DPC4 and oncogene Beta-catenin to further confirm their expression in pancreatic nonductal tumors. Our results showed that in contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas that show loss of Dpc4 protein in 55% of cases, loss of Dpc4 expression is absent in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Expression of 14-3-3 sigma is frequently seen in both pancreatic nonductal neoplasms (25-100%) and ductal adenocarcinomas (89%). Aberrant nuclear expression of beta-catenin is common in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms, specifically in solid pseudopapillary tumors (88%) and pancreatoblastomas (100%) but is rarely seen in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (o5%). Expression of topoisomerase II alpha is not seen in solid pseudopapillary tumors and undifferentiated carcinomas with osteoclastic-like giant cells but is focally seen in pancreatoblastomas (50%) and acinar cell carcinomas (85%). Expression of PSCA and mesothelin was observed in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms but their expression was seen less frequently (0-50%) and weaker than that in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (60-100%). CK19, a marker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, is not expressed in pancreatic nonductal neoplasms. Expression of gamma-synuclein as well as stromal markers (fascin, hsp47 and fibronectin) is frequently seen in both. Our findings indicate pancreatic nonductal neoplasms have distinctive patterns of protein expression relative to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and suggest that pancreatic nonductal neoplasms have different genetic pathways from the more common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas.

The occurrence of smooth muscle neoplasms and lymphoproliferative disorders in immunocompromised patients is well recognized. We report the case of an 8-year-old girl with adenosine deaminase (ADA)-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) status post-bone marrow transplant (BMT), in whom Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was detected in innumerable leiomyomas involving the gallbladder (leiomyomatosis), and multifocal leiomyomas in liver, spleen, pancreas, intestinal tract, and lung. The leiomyomas of the gallbladder, liver, spleen, and lung were asymptomatic, while those located in the colon became clinically manifest by recurrent lower intestinal hemorrhage. The patient also developed extensive EBV-associated polymorphic lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in nodal and extranodal sites. In addition, there were pulmonary and gastric adenovirus and small and large intestine cryptosporidum infections. Our case appears to be the first example of leiomyomatosis of the gallbladder coexisting with multifocal leiomyomas of the liver, spleen, pancreas, intestinal tract, and lung, as well as EBV-derived lymphoproliferative disorder in a young girl with ADA-deficient SCID. Awareness of the pattern of involvement and of the coexistence of benign leiomyomatous proliferations with lymphoproliferative disorder is of value when gallbladder, pancreatic, biliary tree, lung, and intestinal lesions become clinically manifest in these patients. The demonstration of EBV infection in both leiomyomata and the PTLD suggests a common pathogenesis that may have therapeutic and prognostic implications.

The bioprosthesis served as scaffolding for tissue regeneration. There was no postoperative complication at 6 months follow-up. This bioprosthesis could be used to replace the bile duct in cancer or bile duct injury. The bioprosthesis may allow different modeling depending on the type of bile duct injury.

No abstract

No abstract