Background We report the ability to extend lung preservation up to 24 hours (24H) by using autologous whole donor blood circulating within an ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) system. This approach facilitates donor lung reconditioning in a model of extended normothermic EVLP. We analyzed comparative responses to cellular and acellular perfusates to identify these benefits. Methods Twelve pairs of swine lungs were retrieved after cardiac arrest and studied for 24H on the Organ Care System (OCS) Lung EVLP platform. Three groups (n=4 each) were differentiated by perfusate: (1) isolated red blood cells (RBCs) (current clinical standard for OCS); (2) whole blood (WB); and (3) acellular buffered dextran-albumin solution (BDAS, analogous to STEEN solution). Results Only the RBC and WB groups met clinical standards for transplantation at 8 hours; our primary analysis at 24H focused on perfusion with WB versus RBC. The WB perfusate was superior (vs. RBC) for maintaining stability of all monitored parameters, including the following mean 24H measures: pulmonary artery pressure (6.8 vs. 9.0 mmHg), reservoir volume replacement (85 vs. 1607 mL), and PaO2:FiO2 ratio (541 vs. 223). Acellular perfusion was limited to 6 hours on the OCS system due to prohibitively high vascular resistance, edema, and worsening compliance. Conclusions The use of an autologous whole donor blood perfusate allowed 24H of preservation without functional deterioration and was superior to both RBC and BDAS for extended lung preservation in a swine model using OCS Lung. This finding represents a potentially significant advance in donor lung preservation and reconditioning.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is an underused source of donor lungs. Normothermic cellular ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is effective in preserving standard donor lungs but may also be useful in the preservation and assessment of DCD lungs. Using a model of DCD and prolonged EVLP, the effects of donor warm ischemia and postmortem ventilation on graft recovery were evaluated. Adult male swine underwent general anesthesia and heparinization. In the control group (n = 4), cardioplegic arrest was induced and the lungs were procured immediately. In the four treatment groups, a period of agonal hypoxia was followed by either 1 h of warm ischemia with (n = 4) or without (n = 4) ventilation or 2 h of warm ischemia with (n = 4) or without (n = 4) ventilation. All lungs were studied on an EVLP platform for 24 h. Hemodynamic measures, compliance, and oxygenation on EVLP were worse in all DCD lungs compared with controls. Hemodynamics and compliance normalized in all lungs after 24 h of EVLP, but DCD lungs demonstrated impaired oxygenation. Normothermic cellular EVLP is effective in preserving and monitoring of DCD lungs. Early donor postmortem ventilation and timely procurement lead to improved graft function.

Implementation of a simple checklist for use during thoracic organ procurement uncovered a substantial number of near miss events. A preprocedural checklist for all thoracic organ transplants in the United States and abroad is feasible and would likely reduce adverse events.

Early readmission (within 30 days) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation might be a marker for increased mortality. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 277 adults who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation from 2005 through 2015 at our institution. The baseline characteristics of patients who were (versus were not) readmitted within 30 days after LVAD implantation were compared. To assess the impact of 30 day readmission on long-term survival, we used multivariate Cox regression. We also compared the cardiac transplant rate between the two groups. Of the 277 patients, 217 (78.3%) underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge-to-transplant; 76 (27.4%) of the 277 were readmitted within 30 days. The most common reason for readmission was volume overload (23.6%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (15.8%). Male gender, previous smoking, a higher baseline creatinine level, higher Model for End Stage Liver Disease Excluding INR (MELD-XI) score, and postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding or stroke were each associated with 30 day readmission. In our final multivariate model, increased mortality was also associated with 30 day readmission (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.5). Among the 217 bridge-to-transplant patients, the cardiac transplant rate was similar between the two groups: 18.7 transplants per patient-year among those who were readmitted within 30 days versus 19.7 transplants per patient-year among those who were not (p = 0.26). Among our study patients, 30 day readmission after LVAD implantation was frequent and was associated with increased mortality. It is currently unclear whether the general health of those patients was a factor and whether efforts to reduce 30 day readmission would favorably affect longer-term patient outcomes.

Portable normothermic EVLP has been evaluated in clinical trials using standard and extended-criteria donor lungs. We describe a swine model of lung transplant following donation after circulatory death using prolonged normothermic EVLP to assess the relationship between EVLP data and acute lung allograft function. Adult swine were anesthetized and heparinized. In the control group (n = 4), lungs were procured, flushed, and transplanted. Treatment swine underwent either standard procurement (n = 3) or agonal hypoxia followed by 1 (n = 4) or 2 hours (H) (n = 4) of ventilated warm ischemia. Lungs were preserved for 24H using normothermic blood-based EVLP then transplanted. Recipients were monitored for 4 H. After 24H of preservation, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and dynamic compliance (C ) were improved in all EVLP groups. After transplant, EVLP groups showed similar allograft oxygenation. EVLP PVR, mPAP, and lung block weights had significant negative correlations with post-transplant allograft oxygenation. EVLP P:F ratio did not correlate with acute post-transplant allograft function until 24H of preservation. Data measured in the first 8H of EVLP were sufficient for predicting acute post-transplant allograft function. This study provides a benchmark and platform for evaluation of therapies for donor-related allograft injury in injured lungs treated with prolonged normothermic EVLP.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted all aspects of healthcare, including cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). We sought to determine the pandemic's impact on CTS trainees' educational experiences. Methods A survey was developed and distributed to members of the Thoracic Surgery Residents Association and other international CTS trainees. Trainees were asked to evaluate their cumulative experiences and share their overall perceptions of how CTS training had been impacted during the earliest months of the COVID‐19 pandemic (i.e., since March 01, 2020). Surveys were distributed and responses were recorded June 25–August 05, 2020. In total, 748 surveys were distributed and 166 responses were received (overall response rate 22.2%). Of these, 126 of 166 responses (75.9%) met inclusion criteria for final analysis. Results Final responses analyzed included 45 of 126 (35.7%) United States (US) and 81 of 126 (64.3%) international trainees, including 101 of 126 (80.2%) senior and 25 of 126 (19.8%) junior trainees. Most respondents (76/126, 43.2%) lost over 1 week in the hospital due to the pandemic. Juniors (12/25, 48.0%) were more likely than seniors (20/101, 19.8%) to be reassigned to COVID‐19‐specific units (p < .01). Half of trainees (63/126) reported their case volumes were reduced by over 50%. US trainees (42/45, 93.3%) were more likely than international trainees (58/81, 71.6%) to report reduced operative case volumes (p < .01). Most trainees (104/126, 83%) believed their overall clinical acumen was not adversely impacted by the pandemic. Conclusions CTS trainees in the United States and abroad have been significantly impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic, with time lost in the hospital, decreased operative experiences, less time on CTS services, and frequent reassignment to COVID‐19‐specific care settings.