This study suggests that ER is safe, sharing the same perioperative mortality risk as OR despite 44% of the ER group being rejected as unfit for OR. Conventional open repair is the most reliable method of successfully managing AAA. The endoluminal method, however, results in shorter length of hospital stay, shorter length of intensive care unit stay, and less blood loss than the open method. Patients who opt for the endoluminal method of repair should be made aware that the minimally invasive technique carries the disadvantage of a higher failure rate.

Excluded AAAs can increase in size owing to persistent or recurrent pressurization (endotension) of the sac even when there is no evidence of endoleak. One proposed mechanism is pressure transmission via thrombus that lines the attachment site. Endotension may also represent an indiscernible, very low flow endoleak that allows blood to clot at the source of leakage.

Converting an endoluminal to an open AAA repair may require modifications to the standard open technique and result in a much higher than generally accepted morbidity and mortality rate. Patients rejected for open repair because of co-morbidities ran the same chance of requiring conversion as those without co-morbidities (15-17%). If conversion was required, however, they stood a 3 in 7 or 43% chance of dying.

Sixteen-section multi-detector row CT transverse and coronal reformations are equally sensitive and specific for diagnosis of appendicitis. Coronal reformations improve confidence in visualization of appendix (whether diseased or normal) and in diagnosis or exclusion of appendicitis.

Purpose: To present and analyze several cases that illustrate persistent sac pressurization following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods and Results: Four patients with successful endovascular AAA exclusion presented in follow-up with an expanding aneurysm. Two had initial sac diameter decrease, but by 18 and 24 months, respectively, the AAA had enlarged and become pulsatile. There was no endoleak evident, but the proximal attachment stents had migrated distally in both cases. One patient developed endoleak with aneurysm expansion at 6 months; contained rupture occurred at 12 months. The last case had slowly evolving aneurysm expansion over 36 months but no endoleak. All endografts were removed and successfully replaced with conventional grafts. Intrasac thrombus was implicated as the means of pressure transmission that precipitated AAA expansion in these cases. Conclusions: Excluded AAAs can increase in size owing to persistent or recurrent pressurization (endotension) of the sac even when there is no evidence of endoleak. One proposed mechanism is pressure transmission via thrombus that lines the attachment site. Endotension may also represent an indiscernible, very low flow endoleak that allows blood to clot at the source of leakage.

Despite improvements in technology and increasing experience, adverse events continue to occur in a relatively high proportion of patients (45%) who undergo endoluminal repair of AAA. Reporting the incidence rates of adverse events provides a more accurate picture of the morbidity rates of the endoluminal method rather than simply listing the procedures as successes or failures. The similarity in the incidence rates of adverse events in patients in group I and group II suggests that there are inherent risks in the endoluminal method rather than iatrogenic complications that occur during the learning curve with a new technique.

The incidence of systemic/remote complications was similar for the two groups in spite of significantly less blood loss and shorter intensive care unit stay with endoluminal repair. The incidence of local/vascular complications had a tendency to be higher for endoluminal compared with standard open method (and was significantly greater if failed procedures were included). In this early experience with prototype devices, patients who were medically suitable for open surgical procedures did not derive benefit from the less invasive endoluminal technique with respect to duration of operation, length of hospital stay, or perioperative morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, because they also did not have worse outcome, a randomized study is now justified in this group.

Background: Measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 (25OHD 3 ) and D 2 (25OHD 2 ) is challenging. Liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods have been described but they are often complex and difficult to automate. We have developed a simplified procedure involving an automated solid-phase extraction (SPE). Methods: Internal standard (hexadeuterated 25-hydroxyvitamin D 3 ) was added to serum or plasma followed by protein precipitation with methanol. Following centrifugation, a robotic instrument (CTC PAL [Presearch] for ITSP TM SPE [MicroLiter