No abstract

The unpredictability and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic; the associated lockdowns, physical distancing, and other containment strategies; and the resulting economic breakdown could increase the risk of mental health problems and exacerbate health inequalities. Preliminary findings suggest adverse mental health effects in previously healthy people and especially in people with pre-existing mental health disorders. Despite the heterogeneity of worldwide health systems, efforts have been made to adapt the delivery of mental health care to the demands of COVID-19. Mental health concerns have been addressed via the public mental health response and by adapting mental health services, mostly focusing on infection control, modifying access to diagnosis and treatment, ensuring continuity of care for mental health service users, and paying attention to new cases of mental ill health and populations at high risk of mental health problems. Sustainable adaptations of delivery systems for mental health care should be developed by experts, clinicians, and service users, and should be specifically designed to mitigate disparities in health-care provision. Thorough and continuous assessment of health and service-use outcomes in mental health clinical practice will be crucial for defining which practices should be further developed and which discontinued. For this Position Paper, an international group of clinicians, mental health experts, and users of mental health services has come together to reflect on the challenges for mental health that COVID-19 poses. The interconnectedness of the world made society vulnerable to this infection, but it also provides the infrastructure to address previous system failings by disseminating good practices that can result in sustained, efficient, and equitable delivery of mental health-care delivery. Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic could be an opportunity to improve mental health services.

These data indicate that N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists produce a broad range of symptoms, behaviors, and cognitive deficits that resemble aspects of endogenous psychoses, particularly schizophrenia and dissociative states.

Depression is a common, devastating illness. Current pharmacotherapies help many patients, but there are high rates of partial- or non-response and the delayed onset of the effects of antidepressant leave many patients inadequately treated. However, new insights into the neurobiology of stress and human mood disorders have shed light on mechanisms underlying the vulnerability of individuals to depression and have pointed to novel antidepressants. Environmental events and other risk factors contribute to depression through converging molecular and cellular mechanisms that disrupt neuronal function and morphology, resulting in dysfunction of the circuitry essential for mood regulation and cognitive function. Although current antidepressants such as serotonin reuptake inhibitors produce subtle changes that take effect in weeks or months, new agents have recently shown improvement in mood ratings within hours of dosing in patients resistant to typical antidepressants. These new agents have also been shown to reverse the synaptic deficits caused by stress within a similar time scale.

A considerable body of evidence has accumulated over recent years on the functions of the default-mode network (DMN) – a set of brain regions whose activity is high when the mind is not engaged in specific behavioral tasks and low during focused attention on the external environment. In this review, we focus on DMN suppression and its functional role in health and disease, summarizing evidence that spans several disciplines, including cognitive neuroscience, pharmacological neuroimaging, clinical neuroscience, and theoretical neuroscience. Collectively, this research highlights the functional relevance of DMN suppression for goal-directed cognition, possibly by reducing goal-irrelevant functions supported by the DMN (e.g., mind- wandering), and illustrates the functional significance of DMN suppression deficits in severe mental illness.

Recent advances in the understanding of brain cannabinoid receptor function have renewed interest in the association between cannabinoid compounds and psychosis. In a 3-day, double-blind, randomized, and counterbalanced study, the behavioral, cognitive, and endocrine effects of 0, 2.5, and 5 mg intravenous delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (D-9-THC) were characterized in 22 healthy individuals, who had been exposed to cannabis but had never been diagnosed with a cannabis abuse disorder. Prospective safety data at 1, 3, and 6 months poststudy was also collected. D-9-THC (1) produced schizophrenia-like positive and negative symptoms; (2) altered perception; (3) increased anxiety; (4) produced euphoria; (5) disrupted immediate and delayed word recall, sparing recognition recall; (6) impaired performance on tests of distractibility, verbal fluency, and working memory (7) did not impair orientation; (8) increased plasma cortisol. These data indicate that D-9-THC produces a broad range of transient symptoms, behaviors, and cognitive deficits in healthy individuals that resemble some aspects of endogenous psychoses. These data warrant further study of whether brain cannabinoid receptor function contributes to the pathophysiology of psychotic disorders.

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes that hyperactivity of dopaminergic transmission is associated with this illness, but direct observation of abnormalities of dopamine function in schizophrenia has remained elusive. We used a newly developed single photon emission computerized tomography method to measure amphetamineinduced dopamine release in the striatum of fifteen patients with schizophrenia and fifteen healthy controls. Amphetamine-induced dopamine release was estimated by the amphetamine-induced reduction in dopamine D2 receptor availability, measured as the binding potential of the specific D2 receptor radiotracer [1231] The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia, formulated over 30 years ago, proposes that hyperactivity of dopaminergic transmission is associated with this illness (1). This hypothesis is based on the observation that dopamine D2 receptor antagonists alleviate symptoms of the illness (mostly positive symptoms), while dopamine agonists can induce psychotic states characterized by some salient features of schizophrenia (2). These pharmacological effects suggest, but do not establish, a dysregulation of dopamine systems in schizophrenia. Despite decades of effort to validate this hypothesis, documentation of abnormalities of dopamine function in schizophrenia has remained elusive. Postmortem studies measuring dopamine and its metabolites in the brain of schizophrenic patients have yielded inconsistent results (for review, see ref.3). Increased density of striatal dopamine D2 and D2-like receptors has been reported in postmortem studies, but this observation is difficult to interpret, given that neuroleptic drugs upregulate these receptors (4, 5). Positron emission tomography and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) studies of striatal D2 and D2-like receptors density in neurolepticnaive schizophrenic patients have been inconclusive. While one group reported increased striatal D2-like receptors density in schizophrenia (6, 7), other groups reported negative results (8-12). The lack of clear evidence for increased dopaminergic indices in schizophrenia might indicate that dopaminergic transmission is enhanced only relative to other systems, such as serotonergic or glutamatergic systems (13,14). On the other hand, the absence of data supporting the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia might be due to the difficulty of obtaining direct measurement of dopamine transmission in the living human brain.Over the past few years, several groups have provided evidence that competition between neurotransmitters and radioligands for neuroreceptor binding allows measuring changes in synaptic neurotransmitter levels with in vivo binding techniques. In rodents, decreased uptake of D2 radioligands has been measured following amphetamine and other dopamine enhancing drugs, whereas the opposite effect (i.e., increased tracer accumulation) has been induced by drugs that decrease dopamine concentration (15)(16)(17). In baboons, decreased specific uptake of positron emission to...

Mood disorders are common, chronic, recurrent mental illnesses that affect the lives of millions of individuals worldwide. To date, the monoaminergic systems (serotonergic, noradrenergic and dopaminergic) in the brain have received the greatest attention in neurobiological studies of mood disorders, and most therapeutics target these systems. However, there is growing evidence that the glutamatergic system is central to the neurobiology and treatment of these disorders. Here, we review data supporting the involvement of the glutamatergic system in mood-disorder pathophysiology as well as the efficacy of glutamatergic agents in mood disorders. We also discuss exciting new prospects for the development of improved therapeutics for these devastating disorders.