Coastal vulnerability assessments still focus mainly on sea-level rise, with less attention paid to other dimensions of climate change. The influence of non-climatic environmental change or socio-economic change is even less considered, and is often completely ignored. Given that the profound coastal changes of the twentieth century are likely to continue through the twenty-first century, this is a major omission, which may overstate the importance of climate change, and may also miss significant interactions of climate change with other non-climate drivers. To better support climate and coastal management policy development, more integrated assessments of climatic change in coastal areas are required, including the significant non-climatic changes. This paper explores the development of relevant climate and non-climate drivers, with an emphasis on the non-climate drivers. While these issues are applicable within any scenario framework, our ideas are illustrated using the widely used SRES scenarios, with both impacts and adaptation being considered. Importantly, scenario development is a process, and the assumptions that are made about future conditions concerning the coast need to be explicit, transparent and open to scientific debate concerning their realism and likelihood. These issues are generic across other sectors.
Temperature and precipitation trends are described for newly homogenized historical climate data sets for the South-west Pacific. Regions that exhibit similar temperature and precipitation trends and variability are defined, and the temperature and precipitation time series aggregated according to these regions. Four temperature regions show distinctive trends: two regions south-west of the South Pacific Convergence Zone (SPCZ), which dispiay steady climate warming; two regions north-east of the SPCZ, which cooled during the 1970s, and warmed in the 1980s. Annual anomalies differ in response to the El Nifio-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomena, depending on the region's position with respect to a pivotal line along the SPCZ. The climate warming apparent throughout much of the south-west Pacific comes from sites where there can be no question of any urban influence. Five main South-west Pacific precipitation regions show distinctive trends that are connected to the main climatological features. Four New Zealand precipitation subregions relate to the interaction of the main climatological features with local orography. Annual precipitation anomalies show marked variability and are also affected by ENSO in most regions. The pivotal line for the response of precipitation regions lies just to the north-east of the SPCZ. The ENSO relationships with precipitation appear consistent on both annual and interdecadal time-scales. From these climatic trends four climatic response regions are recognized in the South-west Pacific.
Local scale ablation and energy budget measurements are reported for the Ivory glacier in the Southern Alps of New Zealand over 53 days during two consecutive summer periods. Ablation averaged 38 mm day-', but varied from less than 10 mm day ~ I to over 70 mm day I . Radiation supplied 52% of the energy for glacier melt, with the convective fluxes contributing most of the remainder. The results are related to large scale synoptic weather patterns over the southwest Pacific region. Different synoptic situations generate distinctive energy budgets, with radiation important during southerly circulation patterns and the convective fluxes relatively more important with northerly circulation patterns. These findings are discussed in the context of the retreat of New Zealand glaciers this century and possible circulation changes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.