This extension note provides a spatial description of the distribution of small, area-based tenures in the province of British Columbia. It summarizes important socio-economic and biophysical data, including the locations of small tenures. The unique management implications associated with such distribution are highlighted, such as multiple and often overlapping values, implications of mountain pine beetle infestations, climate change, forest restoration, and socio-economic constraints and opportunities.
Tenure reform in British Columbia has been ongoing since the first Timber Licences were granted by the provincial government in 1888. During the last century, four Royal Commissions of Inquiry sought to redefine the ways in which timber resources were distributed. The primary objective of each Commission was to recommend how to make forest legislation reflect the needs of the day. The first of these, the 1909 Fulton Commission, was struck explicitly to examine the recent "timber staking" rush (over 13,500 Timber Licences were granted during a few months), and the subsequent decision to suspend further licensing (Pearse 1976). Fulton's recommendations lead to the creation of the province's first Forest Act. Two Royal Commissions headed by Gordon Sloan in 1945 and 1956 resulted in the introduction of new forms of forest tenure to encourage investment, and the adoption of "sustained yield forestry" (Sloan 1945). The fourth Royal Commission in 1976, headed by Dr. Peter Pearse, made recommendations that lead to further changes in the Forest Act in 1978. These changes included increased opportunities for small operators to access the timber supply.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.