Abstract:This extension note provides a spatial description of the distribution of small, area-based tenures in the province of British Columbia. It summarizes important socio-economic and biophysical data, including the locations of small tenures. The unique management implications associated with such distribution are highlighted, such as multiple and often overlapping values, implications of mountain pine beetle infestations, climate change, forest restoration, and socio-economic constraints and opportunities.
“…Over the past two decades, this has spawned signifi cant literature that assesses community forest experiences worldwide (Pagdee et al 2005;Th ompson et al 2005;Wily 2005; Poff enberger 2006), reviews defi nitions, and even relates community forestry to broader paradigms such as neoliberalism (McCarthy 2006). Not much of this work has focussed on British Columbia, although recent articles (Ambus et al 2007;Cathro et al 2007;Tyler et al 2007;Bullock and Hanna 2008) have examined the local context of community forestry and small-scale tenures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the provincial government proposed to double this program. In total, small tenures account for an annual cut of 3.3 million m 3 , which is less than 5% of the provincial cut (seeCathro et al 2007).…”
The popularity of community-based natural resource management has grown both within British Columbia's forests and around the world. It is often assumed that increased local control of resources will enable more ecologically sensitive forestry practices, but this is not necessarily the case. Through case study examples of "earlier" community forest models in British Columbia and Mexico, the implications of local control for better ecosystem management are investigated. Th is paper suggests that while community forestry in British Columbia has achieved laudable economic goals, it is still a diverse and emerging type of tenure. Increased institutional support for the Community Forest Agreement Program, meaningful levels of community control, lessons learned through future experience, and comparisons to other community forest programs may lead to a better understanding of the conditions for improved ecosystem management in British Columbia.
“…Over the past two decades, this has spawned signifi cant literature that assesses community forest experiences worldwide (Pagdee et al 2005;Th ompson et al 2005;Wily 2005; Poff enberger 2006), reviews defi nitions, and even relates community forestry to broader paradigms such as neoliberalism (McCarthy 2006). Not much of this work has focussed on British Columbia, although recent articles (Ambus et al 2007;Cathro et al 2007;Tyler et al 2007;Bullock and Hanna 2008) have examined the local context of community forestry and small-scale tenures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2003, the provincial government proposed to double this program. In total, small tenures account for an annual cut of 3.3 million m 3 , which is less than 5% of the provincial cut (seeCathro et al 2007).…”
The popularity of community-based natural resource management has grown both within British Columbia's forests and around the world. It is often assumed that increased local control of resources will enable more ecologically sensitive forestry practices, but this is not necessarily the case. Through case study examples of "earlier" community forest models in British Columbia and Mexico, the implications of local control for better ecosystem management are investigated. Th is paper suggests that while community forestry in British Columbia has achieved laudable economic goals, it is still a diverse and emerging type of tenure. Increased institutional support for the Community Forest Agreement Program, meaningful levels of community control, lessons learned through future experience, and comparisons to other community forest programs may lead to a better understanding of the conditions for improved ecosystem management in British Columbia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.