-The Waipounamu Erosion Surface is a time-transgressive, nearly planar, wave-cut surface. It is not a peneplain. Formation of the Waipounamu Erosion Surface began in Late Cretaceous time following break-up of Gondwanaland, and continued until earliest Miocene time, during a 60 million year period of widespread tectonic quiescence, thermal subsidence and marine transgression. Sedimentary facies and geomorphological evidence suggest that the erosion surface may have eventually covered the New Zealand subcontinent (Zealandia). We can find no geological evidence to indicate that land areas were continuously present throughout the middle Cenozoic. Important implications of this conclusion are: (1) the New Zealand subcontinent was largely, or entirely, submerged and (2) New Zealand's present terrestrial fauna and flora evolved largely from fortuitous arrivals during the past 22 million years. Thus the modern terrestrial biota may not be descended from archaic ancestors residing on Zealandia when it broke away from Gondwanaland in the Cretaceous, since the terrestrial biota would have been extinguished if this landmass was submerged in OligoceneEarly Miocene time. We conclude that there is insufficient geological basis for assuming that land was continuously present in the New Zealand region through Oligocene to Early Miocene time, and we therefore contemplate the alternative possibility, complete submergence of Zealandia.

We formally introduce 14 new high-level stratigraphic names to augment existing names and to hierarchically organise all of New Zealand's onland and offshore Cambrian-Holocene rocks and unconsolidated deposits. The two highest-level units are Austral Superprovince (new) and Zealandia Megasequence (new). These encompass all stratigraphic units of the country's Cambrian-Early Cretaceous basement rocks and Late Cretaceous-Holocene cover rocks and sediments, respectively. Most high-level constituents of the Austral Superprovince are in current and common usage: Eastern and Western Provinces consist of 12 tectonostratigraphic terranes, 10 igneous suites, 5 batholiths and Haast Schist. Ferrar, Tarpaulin and Jaquiery suites (new) have been added to existing plutonic suites to describe all known compositional variation in the Tuhua Intrusives. Zealandia Megasequence consists of five predominantly sedimentary, partly unconformity-bounded units and one igneous unit. Momotu and Haerenga supergroups (new) comprise lowermost rift to passive margin (terrestrial to marine transgressive) rock units. Waka Supergroup (new) includes rocks related to maximum marine flooding linked to passive margin culmination in the east and onset of new tectonic subsidence in the west. Māui and Pākihi supergroups (new) comprise marine to terrestrial regressive rock and sediment units deposited during Neogene plate convergence. Rūaumoko Volcanic Region (new) is introduced to include all igneous rocks of the Zealandia Megasequence and contains the geochemically differentiated Whakaari, Horomaka and Te Raupua supersuites (new). Our new scheme, Litho2014, provides a complete, high-level stratigraphic classification for the continental crust of the New Zealand region.Keywords: igneous rocks; metamorphic rocks; New Zealand; Zealandia; sedimentary rocks; stratigraphy; tectonics Introduction It has been 40 years since Carter et al. (1974) proposed a tripartite high-level stratigraphic nomenclature for New Zealand rocks. Their Kaikoura, Rangitata and Tuhua sequences were broad, unconformity-bounded stratigraphic units, with the Rangitata Sequence being subdivided into formal assemblages and zones. Following revisions to the International Stratigraphic Guide, Carter (1988) amended the sequences to synthems.The high-level nomenclature of Carter et al. (1974) and Carter (1988) has not been widely adopted. The orogenies, assemblages, zones, sequences and synthems proposed for New Zealand's Cambrian-Early Cretaceous basement rocks were supplanted by a different, stable and well-used classification based on provinces, terranes and batholiths ( Fig. 1; e.g. Coombs et al. 1976;Tulloch 1988). Carter (1988 defined the Kaikoura Synthem to encompass Late Cretaceous-Holocene cover strata in eastern South Island which he divided into five formal groups onshore, four of which he correlated to informal seismic sequences offshore. While Carter's (1988) use of offshore seismic stratigraphy and his concepts for developing a 'lumping rather than splitting' approach were...

Holocene terraces at Turakirae Head on the south coast of the North Island, New Zealand, record four recent earthquakes from simultaneous rupture of the Wairarapa Fault and flexure of the Rimutaka Anticline. The lowest tread and riser is the modern marine platform and storm beach that began forming when the area was raised during the M w 8.2 Wairarapa earthquake of AD 1855 January. The remaining chronology is established by radiocarbon dating, in situ 10 Be surface-exposure dating, and slip-predictable uplift estimation. Prior to AD 1855, uplifts occurred at 110-430 BC (max. 9.1 m), 2164-3468 BC (6.8 m), and 4660-4970 BC (7.3 m). Earlier uplift of unknown magnitude occurred at c. 7000 BC but went unrecorded because of rapidly rising sea level. Sea level was still rising when the two oldest surviving beach ridges were raised.Uplift at Turakirae Head in AD 1855 varied from 1.5 m at the Wainuiomata River to 6.4 m at the crest of the Rimutaka Anticline. Older beaches also are tilted, with the amount of tilt increasing with age. Coastal uplift at the anticline crest has averaged 3.32 ± 0.17 mm/yr over the past 9000 yr, and has G05031; Online publication date 26 July 2006 Received 8 July 2005; accepted 19 June 2006changed little over the past 0.5 m.y. Uplift fits a slip-predictable model of earthquake occurrence, and is log-normally distributed with a mean of 7.3 ± 0.7 m. The most frequently occurring uplift is 7.1 ± 0.9 m. Uplift in AD 1855 was not significantly smaller than mean or mode, suggesting that the Turakirae Head sequence records four great earthquakes of at least similar magnitude to that of AD 1855. The mean earthquake recurrence interval is 2194 ± 117 yr; the modal interval is 2122 ± 193 yr.At the crest of the anticline, the coastal platform was cut entirely during the postglacial rise of sea level until shortly before 4660-4970 BC. Away from the crest, however, it may have been partially cut during low sea level of the penultimate glaciation. The open-ocean radiocarbon reservoir correction (δR) for 10 14 C dates of coastal marine shells that died in AD 1855 at Turakirae Head is 3 ± 14cal. yrBP(andnot-31 ± 13 cal. yr BP, the currently accepted δR for central New Zealand coastal waters).

The Hellenic subduction margin in the Eastern Mediterranean has generated devastating historical earthquakes and tsunamis with poorly known recurrence intervals. Here stranded paleoshorelines indicate strong uplift transients (0–7 mm/yr) along the island of Crete during the last ~50 kyr due to earthquake clustering. We identify the highest uplift rates in western Crete since the demise of the Minoan civilization and along the entire island between ~10 and 20 kyr B.P., with the absence of uplifted Late Holocene paleoshorelines in the east being due to seismic quiescence. Numerical models show that uplift along the Hellenic margin is primarily achieved by great earthquakes on major reverse faults in the upper plate with little contribution from plate‐interface slip. These earthquakes were strongly clustered with recurrence intervals ranging from hundreds to thousands of years and primarily being achieved by fault interactions. Future great earthquakes will rupture seismically quiet areas in eastern Crete, elevating both seismic and tsunami hazards.

No abstract

No abstract

[1] Earthquakes with surface-wave magnitudes of 7.3-7.9 are estimated to be associated with the rupture of the Wellington Fault at relatively regular intervals of 500-770 years. The last such earthquake probably happened between AD 1510 and 1660. Along its southern segment, the Wellington Fault passes through Wellington, New Zealand's capital, and the densely populated Hutt Valley. It is considered to be a highly hazardous structure. To map the shallow geometry of the Wellington Fault, we have collected 3-D groundpenetrating radar (georadar) data at two sites along the fault in the Hutt Valley. At one site, the first ever georadar fault plane reflections from an active strike-slip fault are observed. They coincide with conspicuous diffractions generated by abrupt truncations of structures against the fault plane. These georadar data provide the most vivid shallow images of any active fault surveyed to date. At the second site, apparent offsets of lineaments in the sedimentary sections on either side of the fault are consistent with $20 m of dextral displacement estimated from the offset of a nearby terrace riser. The dips and minimum depth extents of the primary zones of fault displacement at the two sites are 55-75°SE and $20 m and 72-84°SE and $12 m, respectively. Although the georadardefined zones of faulting are a few meters wide, prominent reflection fabrics suggest that shearing, fracturing, and crushing extend for several tens of meters on either side of the fault.

The Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake of 4 September 2010 (NZST) was the first earthquake in New Zealand to produce ground-surface fault rupture since the 1987 Edgecumbe earthquake. Surface rupture of the previously unrecognised Greendale Fault during the Darfield earthquake extends for at least 29.5 km and comprises an en echelon series of east-west striking, left-stepping traces. Displacement is predominantly dextral strike-slip, averaging ~2.5 m, with maxima of ~5 m along the central part of the rupture. Maximum vertical displacement is ~1.5 m, but generally < 0.75 m. The south side of the fault has been uplifted relative to the north for ~80% of the rupture length, except at the eastern end where the north side is up. The zone of surface rupture deformation ranges in width from ~30 to 300 m, and comprises discrete shears, localised bulges and, primarily, horizontal dextral flexure. At least a dozen buildings were affected by surface rupture, but none collapsed, largely because most of the buildings were relatively flexible and robust timber-framed structures and because deformation was distributed over tens to hundreds of metres width. Many linear features, such as roads, fences, power lines, and irrigation ditches were offset or deformed by fault rupture, providing markers for accurate determinations of displacement.