Location and geometry of the Wellington Fault (New Zealand) defined by detailed three‐dimensional georadar data

Abstract

[1] Earthquakes with surface-wave magnitudes of 7.3-7.9 are estimated to be associated with the rupture of the Wellington Fault at relatively regular intervals of 500-770 years. The last such earthquake probably happened between AD 1510 and 1660. Along its southern segment, the Wellington Fault passes through Wellington, New Zealand's capital, and the densely populated Hutt Valley. It is considered to be a highly hazardous structure. To map the shallow geometry of the Wellington Fault, we have collected 3-D groundpenetrating radar (georadar) data at two sites along the fault in the Hutt Valley. At one site, the first ever georadar fault plane reflections from an active strike-slip fault are observed. They coincide with conspicuous diffractions generated by abrupt truncations of structures against the fault plane. These georadar data provide the most vivid shallow images of any active fault surveyed to date. At the second site, apparent offsets of lineaments in the sedimentary sections on either side of the fault are consistent with $20 m of dextral displacement estimated from the offset of a nearby terrace riser. The dips and minimum depth extents of the primary zones of fault displacement at the two sites are 55-75°SE and $20 m and 72-84°SE and $12 m, respectively. Although the georadardefined zones of faulting are a few meters wide, prominent reflection fabrics suggest that shearing, fracturing, and crushing extend for several tens of meters on either side of the fault.

Characterization of volcanic materials using ground penetrating radar: A case study at Teide volcano (Canary Islands, Spain)

“…GPR is used in geological investigations to define lithological contacts (Jol and Smith, 1991;Pratt and Miall, 1993), locate faults (Rashed et al, 2003;Slater and Niemi, 2003;Gross et al, 2004), in soil studies (Doolitle and Collins, 1995), in glaciology (Overgaard and Jakobsen, 2001) and to estimate the depth to groundwater (Beres and Haeni, 1991;Menezes Travassos and Luiz Menezes, 2004). This technique has been also applied to the study of volcanic deposits and problems related to volcanic hazards (Russell and Stasiuk, 1997;Rust and Russell, 2000;Cagnoli and Russell, 2000;Cagnoli and Ulrych, 2001;Miyamoto et al, 2003).…”

High‐resolution seismic images of potentially seismogenic structures beneath the northwest Canterbury Plains, New Zealand

“…Conventional paleoseismological studies based on geomorphology, outcrops, and trenches [McCalpin, 1996;Yeats et al, 1996] and ground-penetrating radar mapping [Gross et al, 2004;McClymont et al, 2008aMcClymont et al, , 2008b are only of limited use in our study area because many of the potentially seismogenic structures are buried beneath thick sequences of very young sediments ( Figure 5). Accordingly, we have acquired high-resolution (2.5 m subsurface sampling) seismic reflection data along the four lines S1-S4 shown in Figures 2 and 5.…”

Monitoring water accumulation in a glacier using magnetic resonance imaging

“…Using calibrations and additional temperature data, GPR helped estimate the water content in the ice (Hamran et al, 1996;Macheret and Glazovsky, 2000), and more recent GPR research examined temporal changes in glaciers and investigation of 2-D and 3-D structures (Grasmueck et al, 2004;Gross et al, 2004). Study of ice properties by combining surface and borehole radar measurements improves the accuracy of the results (Murray et al, 2000).…”