No abstract

The feeding behaviour of 35 species of Atlantic reef corals was examined in the laboratory and in the field. Observations were made during the day and at night, using freshly hatched brine shrimp nauplii and finely ground, filtered fresh fish as food sources. Three feeding strategies were observed: Group I–feeding by tentacle capture only; Group II–feeding by entanglement with a mucus net or mucus filaments; Group III–feeding by a combination of tentacle capture and mucus filament entanglement. Group I included corals of the families Poritidae and Pocilloporidae which were normally expanded during both day and night. Group II included corals of the family Agaricidae which were normally expanded at night and contracted during the day. Group III included corals of the other families examined which, with the exception of Dendrogyra cylindrus, were normally expanded only at night. Feeding responses were elicited by both chemical and tactile stimuli. A preparatory feeding posture was assumed in response to chemical stimuli and consisted of horizontal positioning of the tentacles, elevation of the oral disk to form a cone‐like mouth, a wide mouth opening and secretion of mucus by the epidermis of the oral disk. Following the assumption of the preparatory feeding posture, food capture and ingestive movements were elicited by tactile stimuli. However, food capture and ingestive movements were also elicited by chemical stimuli alone in those species which were normally contracted during the day. While expanded corals captured food with their tentacles or with mucus filaments, contracted corals were able to feed by capturing fine particulate matter with mucus filaments only and thus acted as suspension feeders. By a combination of feeding strategies, reef corals were able to feed both day and night and a wide range of potential food ranging from fine particulate matter to large zooplankton was available to them.

Assumption of a water-impermeable coat on bacterial spores is inconsistent with known permeabilities of organic materials. A low water content may arise through compressive contraction of the cortex during spore maturation.

No abstract

Summary 1. The first quantitative studies of production on coral reefs were those of Sargent & Austin who showed that productivity on reefs was considerably higher than in surrounding waters. This high production occurred in spite of nutrient limitation and low productivity of offshore waters. Their conclusions have since been confirmed by numerous other workers in both the Atlantic and the Pacific. 2. Primary production on reefs has been studied by flow respirometry, measuring changes in oxygen or carbon dioxide concentrations in water flowing over reefs. Production of benthic organisms has also been measured in situ by light and dark bottle methods and by radioactive tracer techniques. Production values obtained by the various methods are not identical but their use in combination is to be recommended. 3. Rates of gross primary production on reefs vary between 300–5000 gC/m2/yr. These rates are higher than general oceanic values and as high as those of the most productive marine communities. 4. Sources of primary production include fleshy macrophytes, calcareous algae, filamentous algae on the coral skeletons or calcareous rock, marine grasses and the zooxanthellae within coral tissue. Production values from the various sources fall within the range of production of reefs as a whole. 5. Concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in waters flowing over reefs are consistently low. There is evidence to suggest that both these nutrients are recycled rapidly on the reef and that nitrogen is fixed by bacteria and primary producers. 6. In many instances the mass of detritus over coral reefs exceeds the biomass of zooplankton. While the quantitative significance of detritus as food for corals and other benthic organisms has not been evaluated, there is a growing body of evidence to show that this may be the key to understanding secondary production. 7. Opinions differ on the adequacy of zooplankton in satisfying the food requirements of corals and other benthic invertebrates on reefs. The weight of evidence suggests that while there is a removal of zooplankton by benthic organisms, the total biomass carried over the reef is too small to support the energy needs of secondary production. 8. Bacteria are a potential source of energy for secondary production on reefs and are implicated in nitrogen fixation, decomposition and biogeochemical cycling. 9. There is an abundance of sessile invertebrates other than corals on reefs but there are few quantitative data on their importance in secondary production. 10. The biomass of fish on reefs may be very high but the quantitative significance of grazing and predation is not fully established. 11. Studies on the growth of corals themselves have been based on measurements of skeletal accretion. These methods do not lead directly to estimates of reef organic production. Growth rates of corals vary considerably between and within species. 12. Estimates of reef growth have been made from measurements of coral growth and from the flux of calcium carbonate. There is less quantitative inf...

Rates of groundwater discharge onto coral reefs at Barbados, West Indies, were measured with seepage meters and miniature piezometers. Seepage flux varied spatially, was correlated with water depth, and was about twice as high during the wet season as during the dry. Groundwater nitrogen concentrations were correlated with salinity but phosphate concentrations were not. Nitrate content of the discharge was much higher than was phosphate content. Measured fluxes were consistent with groundwater discharge estimates from aquifer models, but a large data set would be required to make accurate predictions of areal groundwater discharge and nutrient loading.

No abstract

No abstract