Chaperones increase the folding yields of soluble proteins by suppressing misfolding and aggregation, but how they modulate the folding of integral membrane proteins is not well understood. Here we use single-molecule force spectroscopy and NMR spectroscopy to observe the periplasmic holdase chaperones SurA and Skp shaping the folding trajectory of the large β-barrel outer-membrane receptor FhuA from Escherichia coli. Either chaperone prevents FhuA from misfolding by stabilizing a dynamic, unfolded state, thus allowing the substrate to search for structural intermediates. During this search, the SurA-chaperoned FhuA polypeptide inserts β-hairpins into the membrane in a stepwise manner until the β-barrel is folded. The membrane acts as a free-energy sink for β-hairpin insertion and physically separates transient folds from chaperones. This stabilization of dynamic unfolded states and the trapping of folding intermediates funnel the FhuA polypeptide toward the native conformation.

Most studies characterizing the folding, structure, and function of membrane proteins rely on solubilized or reconstituted samples. Whereas solubilized membrane proteins lack the functionally important lipid membrane, reconstitution embeds them into artificial lipid bilayers, which lack characteristic features of cellular membranes including lipid diversity, composition and asymmetry. Here, we utilize outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) released from Escherichia coli to study outer membrane proteins (Omps) in the native membrane environment. Enriched in the native membrane of the OMV we characterize the assembly, folding, and structure of OmpG, FhuA, Tsx, and BamA. Comparing Omps in OMVs to those reconstituted into artificial lipid membranes, we observe different unfolding pathways for some Omps. This observation highlights the importance of the native membrane environment to maintain the native structure and function relationship of Omps. Our fast and easy approach paves the way for functional and structural studies of Omps in the native membrane.

How transmembrane β-barrel proteins insert and fold into membranes and by which factors they destabilize, unfold, and misfold represents a field of intense studies. Here, we use single-molecule force spectroscopy to characterize the un- and refolding of the ferric hydroxamate uptake receptor (FhuA), which is one of the largest β-barrel proteins of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Applied to mechanical stress, FhuA undergoes a complex unfolding pathway in which each of the 11 β-hairpins unfolds one after the other until the entire β-barrel has unfolded. Once unfolded and relaxed, the FhuA polypeptide cannot fold back into the lipid membrane and adopts various misfolded conformations. Such misfolding is in contrast to the reversible refolding behavior of much smaller β-barrel outer membrane proteins OmpA and OmpG that occurs at similar experimental conditions. The results suggest that large β-barrel proteins that show more complex (un-)folding pathways require cofactors for proper insertion and folding into the membrane.

One major objective of synthetic biology is the bottom-up assembly of minimalistic nanocells consisting of lipid or polymer vesicles as architectural scaffolds and of membrane and soluble proteins as functional elements. However, there is no reliable method to orient membrane proteins reconstituted into vesicles. Here, we introduce a simple approach to orient the insertion of the light-driven proton pump proteorhodopsin (PR) into liposomes. To this end, we engineered red or green fluorescent proteins to the N- or C-terminus of PR, respectively. The fluorescent proteins optically identified the PR constructs and guided the insertion of PR into liposomes with the unoccupied terminal end facing inward. Using the PR constructs, we generated proton gradients across the vesicle membrane along predefined directions such as are required to power (bio)chemical processes in nanocells. Our approach may be adapted to direct the insertion of other membrane proteins into vesicles.

Light-driven proton pumps, such as proteorhodopsin, have been proposed as an energy source in the field of synthetic biology. Energy is required to power biochemical reactions within artificially created reaction compartments like proto-or nanocells, which are typically based on either lipid or polymer membranes. The insertion of membrane proteins into these membranes is delicate and quantitative studies comparing these two systems are needed. Here we present a detailed analysis of the formation of proteoliposomes and proteopolymersomes and the requirements for a successful reconstitution of the membrane protein proteorhodopsin. To this end, we apply design of experiments to provide a mathematical framework for the reconstitution process. Mathematical optimization identifies suitable reconstitution conditions for lipid and polymer membranes and the obtained data fits well to the predictions. Altogether, our approach provides experimental and modeling evidence for different reconstitution mechanisms depending on the membrane type which resulted in a surprisingly similar performance.

The protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) involved in hemostasis, thrombosis, and inflammation, is activated by thrombin or other coagulation proteases. This activation is inhibited by the irreversible antagonist vorapaxar used for anti-platelet therapy. Despite detailed structural and functional information, how vorapaxar binding alters the structural properties of PAR1 to prevent activation is hardly known. Here we apply dynamic single-molecule force spectroscopy to characterize how vorapaxar binding changes the mechanical, kinetic, and energetic properties of human PAR1 under physiologically relevant conditions. We detect structural segments stabilizing PAR1 and quantify their properties in the unliganded and the vorapaxar-bound state. In the presence of vorapaxar, most structural segments increase conformational variability, lifetime, and free energy, and reduce mechanical rigidity. These changes highlight a general trend in how GPCRs are affected by strong antagonists.

Polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics with potent activity against multi-drug resistant pathogens. They interact with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bacterial membranes, but mechanistic details at the molecular level remain unclear. Here, we characterize the interaction of polymyxins with native, LPS-containing outer membrane patches of Escherichia coli by high-resolution atomic force microscopy imaging, along with structural and biochemical assays. We find that polymyxins arrange LPS into hexagonal assemblies to form crystalline structures. Formation of the crystalline structures is correlated with the antibiotic activity, and absent in polymyxin-resistant strains. Crystal lattice parameters alter with variations of the LPS and polymyxin molecules. Quantitative measurements show that the crystalline structures decrease membrane thickness and increase membrane area as well as stiffness. Together, these findings suggest the formation of rigid LPS–polymyxin crystals and subsequent membrane disruption as the mechanism of polymyxin action and provide a benchmark for optimization and de novo design of LPS-targeting antimicrobials.

Membrane proteins evolved to reside in the hydrophobic lipid bilayers of cellular membranes. Therefore, membrane proteins bridge the different aqueous compartments separated by the membrane, and furthermore, dynamically interact with their surrounding lipid environment. The latter not only stabilizes membrane proteins, but directly impacts their folding, structure and function. In order to be characterized with biophysical and structural biological methods, membrane proteins are typically extracted and subsequently purified from their native lipid environment. This approach requires that lipid membranes are replaced by suitable surrogates, which ideally closely mimic the native bilayer, in order to maintain the membrane proteins structural and functional integrity. In this review, we survey the currently available membrane mimetic environments ranging from detergent micelles to bicelles, nanodiscs, lipidic-cubic phase (LCP), liposomes, and polymersomes. We discuss their respective advantages and disadvantages as well as their suitability for downstream biophysical and structural characterization. Finally, we take a look at ongoing methodological developments, which aim for direct in-situ characterization of membrane proteins within native membranes instead of relying on membrane mimetics.