This paper introduces the Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus, a dataset containing almost 1 million multi-turn dialogues, with a total of over 7 million utterances and 100 million words. This provides a unique resource for research into building dialogue managers based on neural language models that can make use of large amounts of unlabeled data. The dataset has both the multi-turn property of conversations in the Dialog State Tracking Challenge datasets, and the unstructured nature of interactions from microblog services such as Twitter. We also describe two neural learning architectures suitable for analyzing this dataset, and provide benchmark performance on the task of selecting the best next response.
We investigate evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation systems where supervised labels, such as task completion, are not available. Recent works in response generation have adopted metrics from machine translation to compare a model's generated response to a single target response. We show that these metrics correlate very weakly with human judgements in the non-technical Twitter domain, and not at all in the technical Ubuntu domain. We provide quantitative and qualitative results highlighting specific weaknesses in existing metrics, and provide recommendations for future development of better automatic evaluation metrics for dialogue systems.
Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) provide a rich
framework for sequential decision-making under uncertainty in stochastic
domains. However, solving a POMDP is often intractable except for small
problems due to their complexity. Here, we focus on online approaches that
alleviate the computational complexity by computing good local policies at each
decision step during the execution. Online algorithms generally consist of a
lookahead search to find the best action to execute at each time step in an
environment. Our objectives here are to survey the various existing online
POMDP methods, analyze their properties and discuss their advantages and
disadvantages; and to thoroughly evaluate these online approaches in different
environments under various metrics (return, error bound reduction, lower bound
improvement). Our experimental results indicate that state-of-the-art online
heuristic search methods can handle large POMDP domains efficiently
Automatically evaluating the quality of dialogue responses for unstructured domains is a challenging problem. Unfortunately, existing automatic evaluation metrics are biased and correlate very poorly with human judgements of response quality. Yet having an accurate automatic evaluation procedure is crucial for dialogue research, as it allows rapid prototyping and testing of new models with fewer expensive human evaluations. In response to this challenge, we formulate automatic dialogue evaluation as a learning problem. We present an evaluation model (ADEM) that learns to predict human-like scores to input responses, using a new dataset of human response scores. We show that the ADEM model's predictions correlate significantly, and at a level much higher than word-overlap metrics such as BLEU, with human judgements at both the utterance and systemlevel. We also show that ADEM can generalize to evaluating dialogue models unseen during training, an important step for automatic dialogue evaluation.
The Partially Observable Markov Decision Process has long been recognized as
a rich framework for real-world planning and control problems, especially in
robotics. However exact solutions in this framework are typically
computationally intractable for all but the smallest problems. A well-known
technique for speeding up POMDP solving involves performing value backups at
specific belief points, rather than over the entire belief simplex. The
efficiency of this approach, however, depends greatly on the selection of
points. This paper presents a set of novel techniques for selecting informative
belief points which work well in practice. The point selection procedure is
combined with point-based value backups to form an effective anytime POMDP
algorithm called Point-Based Value Iteration (PBVI). The first aim of this
paper is to introduce this algorithm and present a theoretical analysis
justifying the choice of belief selection technique. The second aim of this
paper is to provide a thorough empirical comparison between PBVI and other
state-of-the-art POMDP methods, in particular the Perseus algorithm, in an
effort to highlight their similarities and differences. Evaluation is performed
using both standard POMDP domains and realistic robotic tasks
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.