Studies that treat creativity as operant behavior were critically reviewed. Of the twenty studies, most met minimal requirements for methodological adequacy; all provided at least some evidence for increased creative responding. Major difficulties involved potential confounds between instructions and contingencies, lack of an independent record of the training interaction, lack of social validation data, and very limited evidence for generalization. Several issues were discussed: problems in the behavioral definition of creativity, objections to the use of contingent reinforcement, and the need for empirical analysis of the creative process.As noted by Bijou (1979) and Sloane, Endo, and Della-Piana (1980), the experimental analysis of behavior is often criticized for failure to deal with complex human phenomena such as creativity. Such a criticism is no longer tenable: Studies conducted over the past 13 years clearly address the experimental analysis ofcreativity. What remains unclear is the methodological and conceptual adequacy of these studies and whether the research has dealt with the special problems of creativity. Recent reviews by Goetz (1982) and Sloane et al. (1980) have summarized some ofthe behavioral work but have not provided a comprehensive and critical review.In this paper, we review published studies on the training of creativity as operant behavior. The behavior analytic conception of creativity will first be described, followed by a review of the methodological characteristics and findings of the empirical studies. Finally, we will discuss some ofthe difficulties raised by the analysis of such a complex, subjective, and highly valued activity as creativity. Specifically, the discussion will focus on problems in (a) the definition of a creative response, (b) the use ofcontingent reinforcement, and (c) the analysis of the creative process.The studies included in this review were
ZusammenfassungIm folgenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Studie zusammengefaßt, die sich mit der Evaluation der Implementation (nicht den weiteren Auswirkungen) eines Programms zur differenzierten Verfahrensdurchführung befaßt. Dieses Programm, im Januar 1994 am und vom Obersten Gericht von Neu Südwales eingeführt, wird in seiner Entwicklung und seinen Grundzügen dargestellt; es wird untersucht, inwieweit im ersten Jahr nach Erlaß seine Handhabung wie vom Gericht beabsichtigt erfolgte. Es wurde festgestellt, daß das Programm hinsichtlich seiner Vorschriften, die auf eine angemessene Fallbehandlung und eine Verkürzung der Verfahrensdauer zielen, nicht gänzlich wie geplant durchgeführt wurde. Darüber hinaus wurde festgestellt, daß das Programm in sich so angelegt ist, daß auch bei korrekter Durchführung einzelner Bestimmungen kontraproduktive Effekte entstehen können. Diese Befunde dürften nicht folgenlos sein für die künftige Realisierung der Programmziele (die selbst noch nicht Gegenstand der vorliegenden Studie ist).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.