The chronically inflamed mucosa in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can additionally be infected by bacteria, which results in an acute exacerbation of the disease (AECRS). Currently, AECRS is universally treated with antibiotics following the guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), as our understanding of its microbiology is insufficient to establish specific treatment recommendations. Unfortunately, antibiotics frequently fail to control the symptoms of AECRS due to biofilm formation, disruption of the natural microbiota, and arising antibiotic resistance. These issues can potentially be addressed by phage therapy. In this study, the endoscopically-guided cultures were postoperatively obtained from 50 patients in order to explore the microbiology of AECRS, evaluate options for antibiotic treatment, and, most importantly, assess a possibility of efficient phage therapy. Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequently isolated bacteria, followed by Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae. Alarmingly, mechanisms of antibiotic resistance were detected in the isolates from 46% of the patients. Bacteria not sensitive to amoxicillin were carried by 28% of the patients. The lowest rates of resistance were noted for fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Fortunately, 60% of the patients carried bacterial strains that were sensitive to bacteriophages from the Biophage Pharma collection and 81% of the antibiotic-resistant strains turned out to be sensitive to bacteriophages. The results showed that microbiology of AECRS is distinct from ABRS and amoxicillin should not be the antibiotic of first choice. Currently available bacteriophages could be used instead of antibiotics or as an adjunct to antibiotics in the majority of patients with AECRS.
The biocidal properties of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) prepared with the use of biologically active compounds seem to be especially significant for biological and medical application. Therefore, the aim of this research was to determine and compare the antibacterial and fungicidal properties of fifteen types of AgNPs. The main hypothesis was that the biological activity of AgNPs characterized by comparable size distributions, shapes, and ion release profiles is dependent on the properties of stabilizing agent molecules adsorbed on their surfaces. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were selected as models of two types of bacterial cells. Candida albicans was selected for the research as a representative type of eukaryotic microorganism. The conducted studies reveal that larger AgNPs can be more biocidal than smaller ones. It was found that positively charged arginine-stabilized AgNPs (ARGSBAgNPs) were the most biocidal among all studied nanoparticles. The strongest fungicidal properties were detected for negatively charged EGCGAgNPs obtained using (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). It was concluded that, by applying a specific stabilizing agent, one can tune the selectivity of AgNP toxicity towards desired pathogens. It was established that E. coli was more sensitive to AgNP exposure than S. aureus regardless of AgNP size and surface properties.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects 5-15% of the global population. In some patients, the infectious exacerbations of the disease are recalcitrant to medical treatment and surgery. These cases are probably associated with the presence of bacterial biofilms. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy seems to be a promising antibiofilm strategy. The efficacy of phage therapy in sinonasal infections has been demonstrated both in vitro and in animal models. In the past, phage preparations were also administered to humans with CRS with favorable outcomes and no significant side effects. Very recently, the safety and efficacy of phage therapy in otolaryngological infections has been demonstrated in pioneer Phase I/II clinical trials. This review addresses the potential of phage therapy to treat CRS. We also discuss issues that require further research.
Objectives. To evaluate the spectrum of neurological symptoms in patients with COVID-19 during the first 14 days of hospitalisation and its association with in-hospital mortality. Material and methods.We included 200 patients with RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to University Hospital in Krakow, Poland. In 164 patients, a detailed questionnaire concerning neurological symptoms and signs was performed prospectively within 14 days of hospitalisation. In the remaining 36 patients, such questionnaires were completed retrospectively based on daily observations in the Department of Neurology.Results. During hospitalisation, 169 patients (84.5%) experienced neurological symptoms; the most common were: fatigue (62.5%), decreased mood (45.5%), myalgia (43.5%), and muscle weakness (42.5%). Patients who died during hospitalisation compared to the remainder were older (79 [70.5-88.5] vs. 63.5 [51-77] years, p = 0.001), and more often had decreased level of consciousness (50.0% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001), delirium (33.3% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001), arterial hypotension (50.0% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.005) or stroke during (18.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.026) or before hospitalisation (50.0% vs. 7.1, p < 0.001), whereas those who survived more often suffered from headache (42.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.012) or decreased mood (51.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.003). www.journals.viamedica.pl/neurologia_neurochirurgia_polska Marcin Wnuk et al., Neurological symptoms in COVID-19 Conclusions. Most hospitalised patients with COVID-19 experience neurological symptoms. Decreased level of consciousness, delirium, arterial hypotension, and stroke during or before hospitalisation increase the risk of in-hospital mortality.
Purpose Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a highly prevalent multifactorial disorder. Culture-directed antibiotics are frequently prescribed to patients with CRS and the middle nasal meatus (MM) is traditionally believed to be a representative sampling site of the sinuses as a whole. The purpose of our study was to reevaluate the reliability of the MM as a sampling site in patients with CRS who suffer from impaired drainage from the sinuses to the MM. Methods Swabs and tissue biopsies were collected from the MM, maxillary sinus and frontal sinus from 50 patients with CRS. The results of bacterial culture were compared between sampling methods and sites in relation to the patency of the sinus ostia. Results 782 bacterial isolates were cultured from the samples. Concordant results between the MM and the sinus cavity were noted in 80% of patients for the maxillary sinus, but only 66% for the frontal sinus and 76% for the sinuses a whole. The differences were similarly prevalent in patients with open and occluded sinus ostia. Notably, swabs from all three sites provided representative information in 92% of patients and tissue biopsies did not provide additional information compared to multiple swabs. Conclusion The traditional method of sampling from the middle meatus provides inadequate information in 24% of patients with CRS, which may result in inadequate antibiotic therapy and contribute to increasing antibiotic resistance. Additional sampling from the sinuses should be recommended whenever possible, while invasive sampling is not necessary.
IntroductIon Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyposis (NP) can be associated with aspirin hypersensitivity, representing a syndrome of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). While the pathophysiology of allergic respiratory diseases has been well studied, our understanding of nonallergic CRS and its impact on asthma is still a matter of debate. 1 There is a gap in clinical and pathophysiological knowledge on the effect of upper airway diseases, especially of CRS with NP, on asthma. Nasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) imaging, and clinical symptoms are all helpful in establishing the diagnosis, 2 but provide no information about the etiology and lower airway comorbidity of CRS with NP. The medical management of CRS is currently focused on the control of inflammation that aggravates nasal obstruction. Surgical interventions
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.