To objectively determine the incidence of dysphagia associated with unilateral vocal cord immobility (UVCI) and to evaluate the potential for response to vocal cord medialization, we made videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFS) recordings of patients with newly diagnosed UVCI and prospectively analyzed them in a blinded fashion using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and pharyngeal transport function measures. A subset of patients underwent vocal cord medialization and were evaluated with a postoperative VFS study. Comparison was made between preoperative and postoperative VFS results to study the effects of vocal cord medialization in this setting. Eighty-seven VFS recordings were studied in 64 adult patients with UVCI; 23 patients underwent VFS testing before and after vocal cord medialization. The UVCI was most commonly left-sided (53 cases) and most commonly resulted from thoracic or cardiac surgery (53.1%), followed by malignancy (15.6%). Overall, the median PAS score was 2.0 (25th-75th percentiles, 1.0-5.0), with 20 patients (31.3%) and 15 patients (23.4%) exhibiting penetration or aspiration, respectively. No significant differences in swallowing function were noted between surgical and nonsurgical causes of paralysis (PAS scores of 2.0 and 2.0, respectively; p = .901). The median PAS score improved from 4.0 to 3.0 (p = .395, Wilcoxon paired samples test) in patients studied after undergoing a vocal cord medialization procedure (6 laryngoplasties and 17 vocal cord injections). Laryngoplasty was not more successful than vocal cord injection in resolving aspiration (p = .27). Radiographically significant penetration or aspiration occurs in approximately one third of patients with UVCI, independent of the cause of paralysis. Vocal cord medialization may not be as effective as thought for eliminating aspiration in these patients.

No abstract

Accurate clinical assessment of laryngeal involvement with LPRD is likely to be difficult because laryngeal physical findings cannot be reliably determined from clinician to clinician. Such variability makes the precise laryngoscopic diagnosis of LPRD highly subjective.

Unanticipated patient adverse events can also have a serious negative impact on clinicians. The term second victim was coined to highlight the experience of health professionals with these events and the need to effectively support them. However, there is some controversy over use of the term second victim. This article explores terminology used to describe the professionals involved in adverse events and services to support them. There is a concern that use of the term victim may connote passivity or stigmatize involved clinicians. Some patient advocates are also offended by the term, believing that it deemphasizes the experience of patients and families. Despite this, the term is now coming into widespread use by clinicians and health care managers as well as policy makers. As the importance of emotional support for clinicians continues to gain visibility, the terminology surrounding it will undoubtedly change and evolve. At this time, it may be most appropriate to label this important phenomenon in a way that local leaders are comfortable with-in a way that promotes its recognition and adoption of solutions. For example, for policy makers and health care managers, the term second victim may have value because it is memorable and connotes urgency. For support programs that appeal directly to health care workers, different language may attract more users. Debate concerning the benefits and drawbacks to this terminology will enhance and further drive its evolution, while helping retain our industry's focus on the importance of developing and evaluating programs to support clinicians in need.

Burnout is plaguing the culture of medicine and is linked to several primary causes including long work hours, increasingly burdensome documentation, and resource constraints. Beyond these, additional emotional stressors for physicians are involvement in an adverse event, especially one that involves a medical error, and malpractice litigation. The authors argue that it is imperative that health care institutions devote resources to programs that support physician well-being and resilience. Doing so after adverse and other emotionally stressful events, such as the death of a colleague or caring for victims of a mass trauma, is crucial as clinicians are often at their most vulnerable during such times. To this end, the Center for Professionalism and Peer Support at Brigham and Women's Hospital redesigned the peer support program in 2009 to provide one-on-one peer support. The peer support program was one of the first of its kind; over 25 national and international programs have been modeled off of it. This Perspective describes the origin, structure, and basic workings of the peer support program, including important components for the peer support conversation (outreach call, invitation/opening, listening, reflecting, reframing, sense-making, coping, closing, and resources/referrals). The authors argue that creating a peer support program is one way forward, away from a culture of invulnerability, isolation, and shame and toward a culture that truly values a sense of shared organizational responsibility for clinician well-being and patient safety.

Job burnout is highly prevalent in graduate medical trainees. Numerous demands and stressors drive the development of burnout in this population, leading to significant and potentially tragic consequences, not only for trainees but also for the patients and communities they serve. The literature on interventions to reduce resident burnout is limited but suggests that both individual- and system-level approaches are effective. Work hours limitations and mindfulness training are each likely to have modest benefit. Despite concerns that physician trainee wellness programs might be costly, attention to physician wellness may lead to important benefits such as greater patient satisfaction, long-term physician satisfaction, and increased physician productivity. A collaborative of medical educators, academic leaders, and researchers recently formed with the goal of improving trainee well-being and mitigating burnout. Its first task is outlining this framework of initial recommendations in a call to action. These recommendations are made at the national, hospital, program, and nonwork levels and are meant to inform stakeholders who have taken up the charge to address trainee well-being. Regulatory bodies and health care systems need to be accountable for the well-being of trainees under their supervision and drive an enforceable mandate to programs under their charge. Programs and individuals should develop and engage in a "menu" of wellness options to reach a variety of learners and standardize the effort to ameliorate burnout. The impact of these multilevel changes will promote a culture where trainees can learn in settings that will sustain them over the course of their careers.

No abstract

Adult tonsillectomy provides a significant quality-of-life improvement for patients with chronic tonsillitis. Tonsillectomy also affords decreases in medical resource utilization and missed workdays after tonsillectomy. Such factors should be incorporated into decision making when considering tonsillectomy.