To objectively determine the incidence of dysphagia associated with unilateral vocal cord immobility (UVCI) and to evaluate the potential for response to vocal cord medialization, we made videofluoroscopic swallowing (VFS) recordings of patients with newly diagnosed UVCI and prospectively analyzed them in a blinded fashion using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and pharyngeal transport function measures. A subset of patients underwent vocal cord medialization and were evaluated with a postoperative VFS study. Comparison was made between preoperative and postoperative VFS results to study the effects of vocal cord medialization in this setting. Eighty-seven VFS recordings were studied in 64 adult patients with UVCI; 23 patients underwent VFS testing before and after vocal cord medialization. The UVCI was most commonly left-sided (53 cases) and most commonly resulted from thoracic or cardiac surgery (53.1%), followed by malignancy (15.6%). Overall, the median PAS score was 2.0 (25th-75th percentiles, 1.0-5.0), with 20 patients (31.3%) and 15 patients (23.4%) exhibiting penetration or aspiration, respectively. No significant differences in swallowing function were noted between surgical and nonsurgical causes of paralysis (PAS scores of 2.0 and 2.0, respectively; p = .901). The median PAS score improved from 4.0 to 3.0 (p = .395, Wilcoxon paired samples test) in patients studied after undergoing a vocal cord medialization procedure (6 laryngoplasties and 17 vocal cord injections). Laryngoplasty was not more successful than vocal cord injection in resolving aspiration (p = .27). Radiographically significant penetration or aspiration occurs in approximately one third of patients with UVCI, independent of the cause of paralysis. Vocal cord medialization may not be as effective as thought for eliminating aspiration in these patients.

Our early experience in treating selected head and neck cancers with TORS is associated with excellent oncologic and functional outcomes that compare favorably to primary CRT.

Prolonged and debilitating functional swallowing abnormalities may occur after this aggressive concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimen.

Organ preservation treatment impairs movement of structures essential for normal swallowing. Prophylactic swallowing exercises may benefit these patients.

Oral cancer (OC) survivors experience debilitating side effects that affect their quality of life (QOL) and that of their caregivers. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a dyadic, web-based intervention to improve survivor self-management and survivor/caregiver QOL. A qualitative needs assessment (semi-structured interviews) with 13 OC survivors and 12 caregivers was conducted to discern information and support needs as well as preferences regarding website features and tools. Results using Grounded Theory analysis showed that OC survivors and caregivers: 1) want and need practical advice about managing side effects; 2) want to reach out to other survivors/caregivers for information and support; and, 3) have both overlapping and unique needs and preferences regarding website features. Usability testing (N=6 survivors; 5 caregivers) uncovered problems with the intuitiveness, navigation, and design of the website that were subsequently addressed. Users rated the website favorably on the dimensions of attractiveness, controllability, efficiency, intuitiveness, and learnability, and gave it a total usability score of 80/100. Overall, this study demonstrates that OC survivors and caregivers are interested in using an online program to improve QOL, and that providing tailored website content and features based on the person's role as survivor or caregiver is important in this population.