Femoral cannulation is a minimally invasive method which is an alternative method for central cannulation. This review focuses on the parameters and features of the available peripheral cannulas. Nowadays there exist many peripheral cannulas in a variety of sizes, configurations and lengths to meet the specific needs of the patients. Modern cannulas are strong, thin-walled and one piece reinforced constructions. Furthermore, modern cannulas are manufactured from a biocompatible material and surface coatings are applied to the cannulas to reduce the activation of the clotting. When peripheral cannulas are applied, bleeding, thrombosis and hemolysis are the most common complications.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background:The presence and extent of ventricular dyssynchrony are currently assessed from the QRS complex morphology and width. However, similar electrocardiography (ECG) pattern may be caused by variable ventricular activation sequence. This may then contribute to interindividually different response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).Methods: Electroanatomical mapping and magnetic resonance imaging scan were performed in 11 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB, QRS 170 ± 14 ms) and heart failure of ischemic (coronary artery disease (CAD), n = 2) and nonischemic (dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), n = 9) etiology. Ventricular activation sequence was studied during LBBB and final CRT programming.Presence and extent of scarring were analyzed in the 17-segment left-ventricular (LV) model. Results: Regardless of etiology, presence of typical LBBB was associated with diffuse prolongation of impulse conduction with right-to-left activation sequence. Basal lateral wall was constant site of late activation. This activation pattern was present in "true LBBB," but also in LBBB-like pattern (persistent S wave in V5-6) and left axis deviation. Activation started in right vetricular (RV) apex in patients with left axis deviation at RV free wall in normal axis. Individuals with CAD and DCM patient displayed focal scar. Despite that they exhibited typical LBBB and activation sequence mirrored findings in other LBBB individuals. Reverse remodeling (∆LVESV > 15% after 6 months) was evident in 10 patients. Conclusions: Both typical LBBB and LBBB-like pattern might be associated with constant activation sequence regardless of etiology and scar localization. Activation initiation in RV apex, not LV activation sequence can be surrogate for left axis deviation. CRT caused inter-and intraventricular LV resynchronization without significantly changed RV activation sequence and duration.