To elucidate oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) types in Japan, HPV genotyping was performed in 1526 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and 371 invasive cervical cancer (ICC) patients with the novel Genosearch-31+5 HPV test. The HPV-positive rates were 89.3% and 90.8% in CIN and ICC. Regarding single-type infections, 13 internationally recognized high-risk (13HR) types excluding HPV 35, and probably HR HPV 53, 67, 69, and 70 were identified in ICC, suggesting that all these types may be oncogenic. HPV16 and 18 were identified in both SCC and adenocarcinoma (ADC). HPV HPV52, 31 and 58 (alpha-9) were predominantly detected in SCC, whereas HPV 18, 45, 39 and 59 (alpha-7) were in ADC. The prevalence of HPV 18 in SCC significantly decreased with increasing age of patients, whereas the opposite trend was observed in the other HR types. HPV18 is likely to induce SCC rapidly. All ICC cases aged 20–29 were positive for HPV 16 or 18, suggesting that present HPV 16, 18 vaccines may be quite effective to prevent ICC in young women.

Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is often found by chance. We investigated the prevalence of VAIN and related human papillomavirus (HPV) types in comparison with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). This study enrolled 648 women who were referred to the outpatient clinic determined using Genosearch-31 + 4, which can detect 35 different HPV types.Colposcopy was performed at the first visit by an experienced gynecological oncologist. Among 611 subjects with squamous cell lesions, 107 (17.5%) VAIN cases were identified, and 67 (11.0%) women had both VAIN and CIN. Ultimately, 72 VAIN1, 15 VAIN2/3, 203 CIN1, 249 CIN2/3, 32 cervical squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and one vaginal SCC (Vag-SCC) were identified. The prevalences of VAIN1, VAIN2/3, and Vag-SCC were 35.5%, 6.0%, and 3.1% of equivalent cervical lesions, respectively. The VAIN patients were older than the CIN patients (P = .002). About half of the VAIN cases were diagnosed during the follow-up. Multiple HPV infections were found in 42.9% of the VAIN and CIN patients. HPV52,16, 51, 53, and 56 were the most common types in VAIN, whereas HPV16, 52, 58, 51, and 31 predominated in CIN. HPV18 was rare in VAIN, HPV58 was more common in CIN than in VAIN, and HPV53 and HPV73 were more common in VAIN. In conclusion, VAIN1 was identified more frequently than we expected. Various HPV types were identified in the vagina, which is likely a reservoir for HPV. K E Y W O R D S cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Genosearch-31 HPV genotyping, human papillomavirus, vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia How to cite this article: Zhang S, Saito M, Yamada S, et al. The prevalence of VAIN, CIN, and related HPV genotypes in Japanese women with abnormal cytology.

The SUVmax value helps differentiate benign and malignant ovarian tumours, as well as uterine myomas and uterine sarcomas.

The Aptima human papillomavirus (HPV) test (APTIMA) detects E6‐E7 mRNA in abnormal cells in the uterine cervix. To investigate the accuracy of APTIMA for cervical cancer screening in Japan, 423 subjects, mostly referrals with abnormal cytology or being followed up for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1, were screened using two HPV tests, hybrid capture 2 (HC2) and APTIMA, and by the Pap test. Colposcopy was conducted in all subjects with a positive result in either test type. HPV genotyping was performed by Genosearch‐31. A result of atypical squamous cells‐undetermined significance (ASC‐US) or worse on the HC2 test (ASC‐US‐HC2), and low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or worse (LSIL+) on the Pap test, was regarded as positive. APTIMA (97.5%) was more sensitive than LSIL+ (85.1%) for detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) (McNemar test; p = .0003), and more sensitive (98.6%) than ASC‐US‐HC2 (92.7%) for detecting CIN3+. APTIMA and HC2 had similar sensitivities. HPV genotyping revealed that CIN2/3 with high‐risk HPV (HR‐HPV) was overlooked in five cases by ASC‐US‐HC2, and in four cases by HC2, while no such lesions were missed by APTIMA. Thus, APTIMA might be superior to HC2 for primary HPV screening in Japan. One cancer case positive for HPV67 (potentially high risk, [pHR]) was overlooked by Pap test and both HPV tests, suggesting a need for a new HPV test able to detect pHR‐HPV types.

To examine validity of the hybrid capture-2 and cobas 4800 HPV tests, 396 women including 188 women visiting for cancer screening, and 208 referral cases were examined with both HPV tests and the liquid-based cervical Pap test. Concordant results between the HPV assays were observed in 333 cases (coincident rates; 84.1%, kappa value; 0.682). The sensitivity for CIN2+ was 98.6% (69/70) and 82.9% (58/70) for HC2 and cobas 4800 (McNemar's test; P = 0.0026). The sensitivity for CIN3+ was 97.2% (35/36) and 83.3% (30/36) (Not significant, P = 0.0736). The specificities for CIN2+ or CIN3+ did not differ between the tests. The HPV16, 52, 18, 31, and 58 were the most common types in CIN2+ cases. Reasonable sensitivity for HPV52, and cross-hybridization with some probable high-risk HPV type such as HPV82 explain the higher sensitivity of HC2 than cobas 4800 in detection of CIN2+ in a referral population in Japan.