In histology and cell block sections, antibodies to thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and p63 have been demonstrated to be useful markers for distinguishing between small-cell lung carcinoma and poorly differentiated pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we assessed the utility of TTF-1 and p63, as an antibody panel, for differentiating between these two neoplasms in previously Papanicolaou (Pap)-stained cytologic smears and cytospin slides. Twenty-six lung carcinomas (13 small-cell lung carcinomas, 13 poorly differentiated pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas) were evaluated. One or two previously 95% ethanol-fixed, Pap-stained smears or cytospin slides were selected from each case. The cytologic material from these slides was transferred to positively charged slides. Unstained recuts were obtained from the corresponding histologic specimens or cell blocks. Immunohistochemical staining for TTF-1 and p63 was performed on the paired samples from each tumor. All (13/13) small-cell lung carcinomas were negative for p63 and 92% (12/13) were positive for TTF-1. Conversely, all (13/13) poorly differentiated pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas expressed p63 and did not express TTF-1. Immunoreactivity for p63 was also noted in bronchial reserve cells and metaplastic squamous cells. The immunostaining results obtained from the cytology slides were concordant with those of the histology or cell block sections in all cases. The results of this study show that TTF-1 and p63 immunostaining can be successfully applied to previously Pap-stained cytologic material, as an antibody panel, to facilitate pathologic differentiation between small-cell lung carcinomas and poorly differentiated pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas. p63 immunostaining, however, must be interpreted in conjunction with cytomorphology to distinguish between poorly differentiated pulmonary squamous cell carcinomas and benign cellular constituents of the lung.
Background:A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare analgesic effects and adverse effects of oxycodone and sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.Methods:Adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly allocated into oxycodone and sufentanil groups according to the randomization sequence. Study personnel, health-care team members, and patients were masked to the group assignment throughout the study period. Oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg for endoscopy; 0.15 mg/kg for laparotomy) or sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg for endoscopy; 0.15 μg/kg for laparotomy) was administrated at the end of surgeries. Postoperative pain was controlled using PCIA. Bolus dose was 2 mg and 2 μg for oxycodone and sufentanil group, respectively. The lockout time was 5 minutes for all patients, and there was no background infusion for oxycodone group, whereas 0.02 μg/kg/h background infusion was administrated in sufentanil group. The primary outcomes were the total analgesic doses in PCIA, effective bolus times, the length of first bolus since patients returning to ward from postanesthesia care unit (PACU), rescue analgesic rate in PACU, numeric rating scales, functional activity scores, and patients’ satisfaction scores.Results:A total of 200 patients were screened, and 175 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to oxycodone (n = 87) and sufentanil (n = 88) groups. Both oxycodone and sufentanil PCIA provided adequate postoperative pain relief. Patients in oxycodone group showed a shorter consciousness recovery time after surgery. The major adverse effect in patients from oxycodone group was nausea/vomiting, whereas multiple adverse complications including nausea/vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression were observed in patients from sufentanil group. Patients from oxycodone group showed significantly reduced analgesic drug consumption (calculated as equivalent dose of morphine), functional activity scores, and patient satisfaction scores.Discussion:Compared with sufentanil PCIA, oxycodone PCIA showed better analgesic effects, lower incidence of adverse complications, and less analgesic drug consumption during postoperative pain management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.