Background and Purpose-It has been proved that symptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis benefit from endarterectomy. Currently used methods for quantitation of the severity of carotid stenosis have limitations, and the impact of endarterectomy on the operated region of carotid artery remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of a 3-D ultrasound system for quantitation of stenotic lesions and to evaluate changes in regional vessel volume and cross-sectional area after carotid endarterectomy. Methods-We studied 14 patients with both carotid angiography and 3-D ultrasound. Of 13 patients who underwent surgery, 12 were reexamined with 3-D ultrasound after surgery. The length and volume of 20 randomly selected plaques were measured from 3-D data sets. The severity of stenosis was quantified by 3-D ultrasound using both a diameter method and an area method on cross-sectional views at the most stenotic site; the results were then compared with those from carotid angiography. The segmental vessel volume and average cross-sectional area of the operated artery both before and after endarterectomy were measured from 3-D ultrasound data.
Results-Good correlation was obtained between 3-D ultrasound and carotid angiography in quantitative analysisof carotid stenosis (SEEϭ12.4%, rϭ0.76, and mean differenceϭ7.0Ϯ12.3% with the diameter method; SEEϭ10.5%, rϭ0.82, and mean differenceϭ1.8Ϯ10.5% with the area method by 3-D ultrasound). 3-D ultrasound had excellent reproducibility and small intraobserver and interobserver variability in plaque length and volume measurements. No significant changes in segmental vessel volume and average cross-sectional area of the operated artery were observed after surgery in patients with suture closure. However, a significant increase in segmental vessel volume was obtained in patients with polyfluorethylene patches applied to the surgical opening of the artery. Conclusions-3-D ultrasound can be used for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of plaques in the carotid artery and to detect and quantify significant carotid stenosis. Its volumetric potential has important clinical implications in serial follow-up studies for observing the progression or regression of stenotic lesions and for evaluating the outcome of interventional procedures such as endarterectomy or stent placement. (Stroke. 1998;29:2026-2031.)
We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TTE and TEE, respectively) for assessing valvular perforation during active infective endocarditis by correlating the results of TTE and TEE with anatomic findings of 88 valves examined at surgery or autopsy. Compared with TEE, TTE has a low diagnostic sensitivity in the detection of this complication and, in the presence of hemodynamic instability, multiplane TEE should be performed directly.
Our observations reveal striking differences between the dynamics of normal and stenotic valves. Surprisingly, Doppler-derived mean-valve area correlated better with maximal-anatomic area than with mean-anatomic area in patients with aortic stenosis. Discrepancies between duration of flow and valve opening could explain this phenomenon.
Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography have become the major modalities for the assessment of mitral regurgitation. The combined use of these techniques provides information regarding the morphology of the valvular apparatus as well as the severity of regurgitation. Transesophageal and three-dimensional echocardiography provide a more-detailed evaluation of valve morphology, which can be valuable in determining suitability for valve repair. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, echocardiographic assessment of ventricular size and function plays a critical role in determining the optimal timing of surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.