ObjectivesThis study aimed to use evidence mapping to provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify areas of this field where future research is most urgently needed.MethodsMultiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched to identify clinical trials published up to November 2021 that examined the effect of perioperative ICIs for perioperative treatment of NSCLC. Study design, sample size, patient characteristics, therapeutic regimens, clinical stages, short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes, surgery associated parameters, and therapeutic safety were examined.ResultsWe included 66 trials (3564 patients) and used evidence mapping to characterize the available data. For surgery associated outcomes, sixty-two studies (2480 patients) provided complete information regarding the use of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and data on R0 resection were available in 42 studies (1680 patients); for short-term clinical outcomes, 57 studies (1842 patients) evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and most of included studies achieved pCR in the range of 30 to 40%; for long-term clinical outcomes, 15 studies (1932 patients) reported DFS, with a median range of 17.9-53.6 months; and only a few studies reported the safety profiles of perioperative immunotherapies.ConclusionOur evidence mapping systematically summarized the results of all clinical trials and studies that examined ICIs as perioperative treatments for NSCLC. The results indicated more studies that evaluate long-term patient outcomes are needed to provide a stronger foundation for the use of these treatments.
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor with high metastatic potential and relapse risk. To study the regulatory mechanism of the OS microenvironment, a complex regulatory network involving the ferroptosis- and immune response-related genes remains to be established. In the present study, we determined the effect of a comprehensive evaluation system established on the basis of ferroptosis- and immune-related genes on the immune status, related biomarkers, prognosis, and the potential regulatory networks underlying OS based on the TARGET and Gene Expression Omnibus databases that contain information on OS patients by bioinformatics analyses. We first characterized individual ferroptosis scores and immune scores through gene set variation analysis (GSVA) against TARGET-OS datasets. We then identified differentially expressed genes by score groups. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed to identify the most relevant ferroptosis-related and immune-related gene modules, which facilitated the identification of 327 ferroptosis gene and 306 immune gene candidates. A 4-gene (WAS, CORT, WNT16, and GLB1L2) signature was constructed and valuation using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-Cox regression models to effectively predict OS prognosis. The prediction efficiency was further validated by GSE39055. We stratified patients based on the prognostic scoring systems. Eight hub genes (namely CD3D, CD8A, CD3E, IL2, CD2, MYH6, MYH7, and MYL2) were identified, and TF–miRNA target regulatory networks were constructed. Furthermore, Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, gene set enrichment analysis, and GSVA were used to determine the signature’s potential pathways and biological functions, which showed that the hub genes were enriched in ferroptosis-associated biological functions and immune-associated molecular mechanisms. Thereafter, we investigated the proportion and infiltration extent of 22 infiltrating immune cells by using CIBERSORT, which revealed significant subgroup differences in CD8 + T cells, M0 macrophages, and M2 macrophages. In conclusion, we determined a new ferroptosis-related and immune-related gene signature for predicting OS patients’ prognosis and further explored the ferroptosis and immunity interactions during OS development, which provides insights into the exploration of molecular mechanisms and targeted therapies in patients with OS.
Background OIP5 is found at the centromere and plays an important role in recruiting centromere protein-A (CENP-A) through interacting with Holliday junction recognition protein during cell mitosis. OIP5 is considered to be a cancer-testis specific gene, but its function in tumor development remains unclear. Increased expression of OIP5 has been reported in testis as well as in different cancers; however, the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. Methods Data were collected from the Genotype-Tissue Expression project, the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to analyze the effect of OIP5 in many common cancers. Analyses of the differential expression of OIP5 and its relationships with prognosis, the tumor microenvironment, immune infiltration, immune regulation, neoantigen production, and genomic stability in various cancers were performed using R software. Results Expression of OIP5 was significantly increased in 34 common tumor types compared with matched healthy samples; however, no significant increases were observed in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma or kidney chromophobe. Elevated OIP5 expression predicted dismal overall survival in 14 tumors. The function of OIP5 in tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIIC) was analyzed, and OIP5 might inhibit TIIC infiltration in the tumor microenvironment; a positive correlation was found in thymoma, while a negative correlation was observed in lung squamous cell carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma. High OIP5 expression was related to immune regulation and neoantigen production, particularly in terms of the levels of immune regulatory molecules and the number of neoantigens produced in lung adenocarcinoma, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, breast cancer, stomach adenocarcinoma, low-grade glioma, and prostate adenocarcinoma. It was also associated with increased cell genome instability in lung adenocarcinoma. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed potential critical effects of OIP5 on the cell cycle, base excision repair, homologous recombination, DNA replication, the p53 signaling pathway, and mismatch repair pathways. Conclusions High expression of OIP5 is found in many common tumors and predicts a dismal prognostic outcome. The gene is an important recruitment factor for CENP-A and may promote tumor progression by affecting the tumor immune microenvironment and genomic stability. Therefore, OIP5 can serve as a potential candidate factor to predict cancer prognosis and guide the use of therapeutics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.