Introduction:Chronic active Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection (CAEBV) is characterized as chronic or recurrent mononucleosis-like symptoms and elevated EBV deoxyribonucleic acid (EBV-DNA) copies. Cardiovascular complications have high morbidity and mortality. The treatment regimen for CAEBV has not been established yet, resulting in poor prognoses. Herein, we present a case of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) evaluation with a series of sequences for CAEBV-associated cardiovascular involvement, which has never been reported.Case presentation:A 16-year-old female (body weight, 55 kg) developed a persistent fever and a positive EBV-DNA level of 28,000 copies/mL. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed aneurysms involving the aorta and its major branches, as well as multiple aneurysms and stenoses of the coronary arteries. CMRI of the coronary arteries depicted the dilution and stenosis of the arterial lumen as well as the thickening of the arterial wall. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) showed subendocardial and transmural delayed enhancement of the left ventricle, suggesting myocardial infarction.CAEBV and associated cardiovascular complications were diagnosed. After treatment with Medrol and Leflunomide, the clinical manifestation and serological parameters reversed to normal. However, the EBV-DNA level increased again to 13,900 copies/mL 2 months later. A follow-up with aorta CTA showed that the arterial walls of the bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms were thicker with new-onset mural thrombi. The aorta CTA also showed new-onset occlusion of the right coronary artery, but a follow-up of CMRI at the same day did not find new-onset delayed enhancement lesion.Conclusion:This case reminds clinicians of the vital importance of early diagnosis and close follow-up of CAEBV-associated cardiovascular complications. With cine imaging, coronary artery imaging, LGE imaging, and other novel techniques, CMRI can effectively and comprehensively reveal the early and dynamic changes, and act as an important tool in the field of cardiovascular diseases.
Background: The most critical concern for management of childhood intussusception is the bowel resection due to the intestinal ischemia and necrocis. It is of great importance for early prediction of this problem. We investigate the value of various combinations of inflammatory factors to predict the intestinal necrocis and resection.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients with intussusception, which undergone surgical management. During the research period, 47 patients undergone intestinal resection due to intestinal necrocis and 68 patients without intestinal resection were enrolled. We evaluated the diagnostic values of various combination of inflammatory markers from preoperative period laboratory analyses using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method.Results: In the current cohort, 115 patients were operated for intussusception, among them, 47 patients (40.9%) undergone intestinal resections. In patients with intestinal resections, neutrophil count(p=0.013), CRP(p=0.002), platelet–lymphocyte ratio(PLR, p=0.008), NLR(neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, p=0.026), and LCR(lymphocyte–CRP ratio, p<0.001) values were significantly higher than those in the patients without any resections. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis results showed that the combination of lymphocytic count along with C-reactive protein levels (LCR) demonstrated the highest correlation with intestinal resection due to intussusception compared with other parameters in patients, with sensitivity of 0.82(0.73–0.86) and specifficity of 0.80(0.57–0.94) for the diagnosis of strangulation. Conclusion: The preoperative LCR level is a useful marker to predict the need for intestinal resection due to intestinal necrosis in patients with intussusception.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.