Summary Currently severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission has been on the rise worldwide. Predicting outcome in COVID‐19 remains challenging, and the search for more robust predictors continues. We made a systematic meta‐analysis on the current literature from 1 January 2020 to 15 August 2020 that independently evaluated 32 circulatory immunological signatures that were compared between patients with different disease severity was made. Their roles as predictors of disease severity were determined as well. A total of 149 distinct studies that evaluated ten cytokines, four antibodies, four T cells, B cells, NK cells, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils were included. Compared with the non‐severe patients of COVID‐19, serum levels of Interleukins (IL)‐2, IL‐2R, IL‐4, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐10 and tumor necrosis factor α were significantly up‐regulated in severe patients, with the largest inter‐group differences observed for IL‐6 and IL‐10. In contrast, IL‐5, IL‐1β and Interferon (IFN)‐γ did not show significant inter‐group difference. Four mediators of T cells count, including CD3 + T, CD4 + T, CD8 + T, CD4 + CD25 + CD127 ‐ Treg, together with CD19 + B cells count and CD16 + CD56 + NK cells were all consistently and significantly depressed in severe group than in non‐severe group. SARS‐CoV‐2 specific IgA and IgG antibodies were significantly higher in severe group than in non‐severe group, while IgM antibody in the severe patients was slightly lower than those in the non‐severe patients, and IgE antibody showed no significant inter‐group differences. The combination of cytokines, especially IL‐6 and IL‐10, and T cell related immune signatures can be used as robust biomarkers to predict disease severity following SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV), an emerging tick-borne bunyavirus, causes mild-to-moderate infection to critical illness or even death in human patients. The effect of virus variations on virulence and related clinical significance is unclear. We prospectively recruited SFTSV-infected patients in a hotspot region of SFTS endemic in China from 2011 to 2020, sequenced whole genome of SFTSV, and assessed the association of virus genomic variants with clinical data, viremia, and inflammatory response. We identified seven viral clades (I-VII) based on phylogenetic characterization of 805 SFTSV genome sequences. A significantly increased case fatality rate (32.9%) was revealed in one unique clade (IV) that possesses a specific co-mutation pattern, compared to other three common clades (I, 16.7%; II, 13.8%; and III, 11.8%). The phenotype-genotype association (hazard ratios ranged 1.327-2.916) was confirmed by multivariate regression adjusting age, sex, and hospitalization delay. We revealed a pronounced inflammation response featured by more production of CXCL9, IL-10, IL-6, IP-10, M-CSF, and IL-1β, in clade IV, which was also related to severe complications. We observed enhanced cytokine expression from clade IV inoculated PBMCs and infected mice. Moreover, the neutralization activity of convalescent serum from patients infected with one specified clade was remarkably reduced to other viral clades. Together, our findings revealed a significant association between one specific viral clade and SFTS fatality, highlighting the need for molecular surveillance for highly lethal strains in endemic regions and unravelled the importance of evaluating cross-clade effect in development of vaccines and therapeutics.

Moderate HCA is associated with equivalent operative mortality and morbidity and visceral organ functions compared to deep HCA in patients with acute TAAD undergoing total arch replacement under uSACP. This study implies the clinical safety and efficacy of moderate HCA in emergency aortic arch repair for such patients, which provides equivalent cerebral and visceral organ protection while decreasing CPB and cross-clamp times without increasing the risk of operative mortality and morbidity.

No abstract

Background Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is an emerging infectious disease with high mortality, however with no effective therapy available. Methods The effect of favipiravir (FPV) in treating SFTS was evaluated by an integrated analysis on data collected from a single-arm study (n=428), a surveillance study (n=2350) and published data from a randomized controlled trial study (n=145). A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to include 780 patients: 390 received FPV and 390 received supportive therapy only. Case fatality rates (CFRs), clinical progress, and adverse effects were compared. Findings FPV treatment had significantly reduced CFR from 20.0% to 9.0% (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.65), however showing heterogeneity when patients were grouped by age, onset-to-admission interval, initial viral load and therapy duration. The effect of FPV was significant only among patients aged ≤70 years, with onset-to-admission interval ≤5 days, therapy duration ≥5 days or baseline viral load ≤1 × 10 6 copies/mL. Age-stratified analysis revealed no benefit in the aging group >70 years, regardless of their sex, onset-to-admission interval, therapy duration or baseline viral load. However, for both ≤60 and 60-70 years groups, therapy duration and baseline viral load differentially affected FPV therapy efficiency. Hyperuricemia and thrombocytopenia, as the major adverse response of FPV usage, were observed in >70 years patients. Interpretation FPV was safe in treating SFTS patients but showed no benefit for those aged >70 years. Instant FPV therapy could highly benefit SFTS patients aged 60-70 years. Funding China Natural Science Foundation (No. 81825019, 82073617 and 81722041) and China Mega-project for Infectious Diseases (2018ZX10713002 and 2015ZX09102022).