Objectives: To develop and evaluate two BMI-based instruments to determine perceptions of weight status, particularly perceptions of overweight and obesity, using pictorial images of women and men. Methods: Pictures of adults with known BMI values were used to construct gender-specific body size guides (BSGs) containing 10 bodies that ranged from underweight to class III obesity. Figures were standardized and a composite face was added to each. The BSGs were administered to 400 adults to assess the psychometric properties of the instruments and weight perceptions. Results: High correlations between the BMIs of respondents and the BMIs of the current body selected by respondents provided strong support for the criterion-related validity of the BSGs, and the logical pattern of responses to items assessing perception of weight categories supported construct validity for the scales. Test-retest reliability, assessed by correlations for both current and ideal body, was also high, despite the lengthy 6-month testing interval. Respondents' perceptions of the bodies within specific weight categories indicated that a majority failed to recognize the overweight female as overweight and perceived the overweight male as normal weight. Obese bodies were generally unrecognized as such until the bodies reached the higher levels of obesity (that is, BMI values 439). Perception of weight was influenced by the respondents' weight status and gender. Conclusions: Psychometric analyses indicated the BSGs are valid and reliable instruments. These results, coupled with the face validity of the scales and the relationship between the bodies and BMI values, indicate the BSGs offer advantages over existing instruments for researchers of weight perception and body image. Administration of the scales to an adult sample confirmed that overweight and obesity are under-recognized. Increased efforts to improve public understanding of these terms are needed and the BSGs may provide useful tools for this purpose.
Attitudinal, social normative, and environmental barriers to health screenings may be characteristic of impoverished rural Appalachians. Interventions are being designed to target these belief barriers to improve participation in cholesterol screenings for fifth graders.
Community participation is key in identifying unique health needs and should be incorporated into the assessment process by nonprofit hospitals, local health departments, and other public health practitioners. As reforms are considered to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it will be important to emphasize the importance of community input in identifying ways nonprofit hospitals contribute community benefit. CHNAs without adequate public input may not translate into implementation plans that accurately address pressing health concerns.
The Coronary Artery Risk Detection in Appalachian Communities Project was developed to reduce children's future cardiovascular risk by implementing a school-based screening program statewide. Despite the elimination of environmental barriers related to screening cost and accessibility, only half of eligible children participate in the program each year. The authors used the theory of planned behavior to identify health beliefs associated with screening participation. This article describes the process used to identify community health beliefs and the development of theoretically based materials to increase participation. Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted to identify core health beliefs held by parents, community leaders, and children (Phase I). Data obtained were used to expand and revise a Health Beliefs Questionnaire, which was distributed to larger samples (Phase II). This information was used to design recruitment materials that emphasized the benefits of screening while directly addressing potential belief-based barriers to screening participation (Phase III).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.