Germline DDX41 variants are the most common mutations predisposing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in adults, but the causal variant (CV) landscape and clinical spectrum of hematologic malignancies (HM) remain unexplored. Here, we analyzed the genomic profiles of 176 HM patients carrying 82 distinct presumably germline DDX41 variants among a group of 9,821 unrelated patients. Using our proposed DDX41 specific variant classification, we identified features distinguishing 116 HM patients with CV from 60 HM patients with variant of uncertain significance (VUS): an older age (median 69 years), male predominance (74% in CV versus 60% in VUS, P=0.03), frequent concurrent somatic DDX41 variants (79% in CV versus 5% in VUS, p<0.0001), a lower somatic mutation burden (1.4 ± 0.1 in CV versus 2.9 ± 0.04 in VUS, P=0.012), near exclusion of canonical recurrent genetic abnormalities including mutations in NPM1, CEBPA and FLT3 in AML, and favorable overall survival (OS) in AML/MDS patients. This superior OS was determined independent of blast count, abnormal karyotypes, and concurrent variants, including TP53 in AML/MDS patients, regardless of patient's sex, age or specific germline CV, suggesting that germline DDX41 variants define a distinct clinical entity. Furthermore, unrelated patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and B-cell lymphoma were linked by DDX41 CV, thus expanding the known disease spectrum. This study outlines the CV landscape, expands the phenotypic spectrum in unrelated DDX41-mutated patients, and underscores the urgent need for gene-specific diagnostic and clinical management guidelines.

Germline variants in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) can result in RNA mis-splicing and predisposition to cancer. However, identification of variants that impact splicing remains a challenge, contributing to a substantial proportion of patients with suspected hereditary cancer syndromes remaining without a molecular diagnosis. To address this, we used capture RNAsequencing (RNA-seq) to generate a splicing profile of 18 TSGs (APC,

No abstract

No abstract

PURPOSE To compare the classification of genetic variants reported on tumor genomic profiling (TGP) reports with germline classifications on clinical test results and ClinVar. Results will help to inform germline testing discussions and decisions in patients with tumor variants in genes that are relevant to hereditary cancer risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study compared somatic and germline classifications of small nucleotide variants in the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, ATM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Somatic classifications were taken from reports from a single commercial TGP laboratory of tests ordered by providers at Huntsman Cancer Institute between March 2014 and June 2018. Somatic variant interpretations were compared with classifications from germline test results as well as with ClinVar interpretations. RESULTS Of the 623 variants identified on TGP, 353 had a definitive classification in ClinVar, and 103 were assayed with a germline test, with 66 of the variants tested observed in germline. Analysis of somatic variants of uncertain significance listed on TGP reports determined that 22% had a different interpretation compared with ClinVar and that 32% differed from the interpretation on a germline test result. Pathogenic variants on TGP test results were found to differ 13% and 5% of the time compared with ClinVar interpretations and germline test results, respectively. CONCLUSION These results suggest that TGP variants are often classified differently in a germline context. Differences may be due to different processes in variant interpretation between somatic and germline laboratories. These results are important for health care providers to consider when making decisions about additional testing for hereditary cancer risks.

Genetic testing is becoming an integral part of healthcare, but evidence suggests that both race and ethnicity influence access to and utilization of genetic testing. Given this barrier, data are needed on the perceptions of genetic testing in racial and ethnic minority groups. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of three types of genetic testing (genetic testing for adult-onset conditions, prenatal screening, and newborn screening) in a sample of US participants who identified as White, Pacific Islander, and Latinx (10 dyads from each group for 60 participants total). Data were collected through semi-structured dyadic interviews and assessed using thematic analysis. The major themes were knowledge as empowering, knowledge as stressful, and predictive nature of prenatal testing and newborn screening. Some differences were seen in themes by race and ethnicity. A sense of collective and familial health appeared to be a more important theme for Pacific Islander and Latinx participants compared to White participants. Adult-onset genetic testing was viewed variously across all groups with some noting how it may increase anxiety, particularly if the disease screened for was unable to be prevented with action. All three groups reported on the positives of prenatal testing and newborn screening yet often were confused on the differences between them. This study presents novel perceptions of genetic testing in participants from diverse communities across three types of genetic testing. Genetic healthcare providers should incorporate participants' perceptions, values, and beliefs into their counseling delivery as a way to engage with diverse communities.

Author affiliations and support information (if applicable) appear at the end of this article.

No abstract