Serum 25-(OH)D is a negative acute phase reactant, which has implications for acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. Serum 25-(OH)D is an unreliable biomarker of vitamin D status after acute inflammatory insult. Hypovitaminosis D may be the consequence rather than cause of chronic inflammatory diseases.
OBJECTIVE We previously showed that in patients with diabetes mellitus, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) monitoring outside international guidance on testing frequency is widespread. Here we examined the relationship between testing frequency and diabetes control to test the hypothesis that retest interval is linked to change in HbA1c level. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We examined repeat HbA1c tests (400,497 tests in 79,409 patients, 2008–2011) processed by three U.K. clinical laboratories. We examined the relationship between retest interval and 1) percentage change in HbA1c and 2) proportion of cases showing a significant HbA1c rise. The effect of demographics factors on these findings was also explored. RESULTS Our data showed that the optimal testing frequency required to maximize the downward trajectory in HbA1c was four times per year, particularly in those with an initial HbA1c of ≥7% (≥53 mmol/mol), supporting international guidance. Testing 3-monthly was associated with a 3.8% reduction in HbA1c compared with a 1.5% increase observed with annual testing; testing more frequently provided no additional benefit. Compared with annual monitoring, 3-monthly testing was associated with a halving of the proportion showing a significant rise in HbA1c (7–10 vs. 15–20%). CONCLUSIONS These findings provide, in a large, multicenter data set, objective evidence that testing outside guidance on HbA1c monitoring frequency is associated with a significant detrimental effect on diabetes control. To achieve the optimum downward trajectory in HbA1c, monitoring frequency should be quarterly, particularly in cases with suboptimal HbA1c. While this impact appears small, optimizing monitoring frequency across the diabetes population may have major implications for diabetes control and comorbidity risk.
We report, for the first time, that automated minimum retesting interval rejection rules as a stand-alone strategy are a cheap and sustainable method for reducing unnecessary repeat CRP tests, resulting in small laboratory cash savings, more efficient use of laboratory resources and standardisation of patient care pathways. The minimum retesting interval rejection rule also altered clinician test-requesting behaviour towards more appropriate requesting.
The diagnostic sensitivity of the calprotectin assays was similar despite inter-kit variability in absolute values. There is a need for f-Cp assay standardisation, but in its absence assay-specific cut-off values may optimise their diagnostic performance. F-S100A12 demonstrated comparable sensitivity and specificity to f-Cp and although a research tool at present, may have a future role to play in the diagnosis and management of these patients.
Background We previously showed, in patients with diabetes, that >50% of monitoring tests for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) are outside recommended intervals and that this is linked to diabetes control. Here, we examined the effect of tests/year on achievement of commonly utilised HbA1c targets and on HbA1c changes over time. Methods Data on 20,690 adults with diabetes with a baseline HbA1c of >53 mmol/mol (7%) were extracted from Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory records at three UK hospitals. We examined the effect of HbA1c tests/year on (i) the probability of achieving targets of ≤53 mmol/mol (7%) and ≤48 mmol/mol (6.5%) in a year using multi-state modelling and (ii) the changes in mean HbA1c using a linear mixed-effects model. Results The probabilities of achieving ≤53 mmol/mol (7%) and ≤48 mmol/mol (6.5%) targets within 1 year were 0.20 (95% confidence interval: 0.19–0.21) and 0.10 (0.09–0.10), respectively. Compared with four tests/year, having one test or more than four tests/year were associated with lower likelihoods of achieving either target; two to three tests/year gave similar likelihoods to four tests/year. Mean HbA1c levels were higher in patients who had one test/year compared to those with four tests/year (mean difference: 2.64 mmol/mol [0.24%], p<0.001). Conclusions We showed that ≥80% of patients with suboptimal control are not achieving commonly recommended HbA1c targets within 1 year, highlighting the major challenge facing healthcare services. We also demonstrated that, although appropriate monitoring frequency is important, testing every 6 months is as effective as quarterly testing, supporting international recommendations. We suggest that the importance HbA1c monitoring frequency is being insufficiently recognised in diabetes management.
chemical pathologist and honorary professor of laboratory medicine, Jenna L Waldron senior clinical scientist, Helen L Ashby specialist registrar in chemical pathology and metabolic medicine, Michael P Cornes senior clinical scientist, Julia Bechervaise academic FY2, Cyrus Razavi academic FY2, Osmond L Thomas consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Sanjiv Chugh consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Shreeram Deshpande consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Clare Ford consultant clinical scientist New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UKIn their editorial calling for vitamin D to be put into perspective Harvey and Cooper do not consider the possibility, supportive to their view, that hypovitaminosis D is the consequence rather than the cause of disease. 1 We recently completed a study showing unequivocally that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is a negative acute phase reactant.We measured serum C reactive protein and 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations before and two days after elective knee or hip surgery in 30 patients. After surgery the mean serum concentration of C reactive protein increased (5.0 (SD 5.5) v 116.0 (81.2) mg/L; P <0.0001), whereas serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D decreased (56.2 (30.3) v 46.0 (27.6) nmol/L; P <0.0006).These results are consistent with those of two other studies reporting a rapid and noticeable fall in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration during a systemic inflammatory response. 2 3 They seem, however, to contradict the results of two other studies reporting no change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration for up to 90 days after an inflammatory insult. 4 5 The initial serum samples in these last two studies were, however, all collected after the inflammatory insult, 4 5 when serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is already likely to be at a nadir. 2 3 A unifying explanation for the apparently conflicting results of these four studies is that serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration decreases rapidly and dramatically after an inflammatory insult and persists for at least three months.That serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is a negative acute phase reactant has implications for acute and chronic diseases. Firstly, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is an unreliable biomarker of vitamin D status after an acute inflammatory insult. Secondly, hypovitaminosis D may be the consequence rather than the widely purported cause of a myriad of chronic diseases. 1 et al. The relation between acute changes in the systemic inflammatory response and plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations after elective knee arthroplasty. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;93:1006-11. 3 Louw JA, Werbeck A, Louw ME, Kotze TJ, Cooper R, Labadarios D. Blood vitamin concentrations during the acute-phase response. Crit Care Med 1992;20:934-41. 4 Newens K, Filteau S, Tomkins A. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D does not vary over the course of a malarial infection. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006;100:41-4. 5 Barth JH, Field HP, Mather AN, Plein S. Serum 25 hydroxy-vitamin D does not exhibit an acute phase reaction after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:399-401.
The SIR is associated with a decrease in SUA concentrations in normouricaemic patients without gout. The decrease in SUA concentrations is not due to increased urinary excretion of UA. This study supports the notion that the decrease in SUA during acute gout is due to the associated SIR rather than gout per se.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.