BackgroundTo date, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule for identifying children who are at very low risk of clinically-important traumatic brain injuries after minor head trauma has not been validated prospectively in an independent population. Our goal was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PECARN clinical decision rule in a French pediatric population in multiple clinical settings.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of patients with minor head trauma who presented to three emergency departments in France. We enrolled patients younger than 16 years of age seeking a consultation within 24 h of head trauma with Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 14–15.ResultsDuring the study period, we included 1499 children of which 421 (28 %) were under 2 years of age, and 955 (64 %) were male. A cranial computed tomography (CT) scan was performed on 76 patients (5.1 %). Of the 1499 included patients, 9 children (0.6 %) had a clinically-important traumatic brain injury, and none were classified as very low risk by the PECARN rule. In our study, the sensitivity of this clinical decision rule was 100 % (95 % CI 66.4 to 100 %), the specificity was 69.9 % (95 % CI 67.5 to 72.2 %) and the negative predictive value was 100 % (95 % CI 99.7 to 100 %).DiscussionOur study confirmed the good predictive performances of the PECARN clinical decision rule for minor head trauma in children. The PECARN rule performed similarly to our study and to its internal validation study.ConclusionsWe conducted an external validation study of the PECARN clinical decision rule for the detection of clinically-important traumatic brain injuries in children with minor head trauma, according to the methodological standards. The PECARN rule successfully identified all patients with clinically-important traumatic brain injuries, with a limited use of CT scans. Conducting a broad validation study with a large cohort is a prerequisite to provide sufficient statistical power before authorizing its implementation and generalization.Trial registrationThis study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier number: NCT02752711 on April 27, 2016.

S100B serum analysis as a part of the clinical routine could significantly reduce the number of CT scans performed on children with mTBI. Sampling should take place within 3 hours of trauma. Cutoff levels should be based on pediatric reference ranges.

No abstract

Minor head trauma is a common reason for consultation in pediatric emergency departments. In 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) published a clinical decision rule for its management. It aimed to help clinicians identify children with a very low risk of developing intracranial lesions, so that unnecessary cranial computed tomography (CCT) scan radiation could be avoided, as such exposure is associated with a rising risk of cancer in this young population. In the meantime, the serum S100β neuroprotein showed encouraging results, with a 30% potential decrease in CCTs for the management of minor head traumas in adults and children. The aim of this study was to determine if the serum S100β neuroprotein, associated with the PECARN clinical decision rule, could safely reduce the use of CCTs. We included children who were examined at the pediatric emergency department for minor head trauma, who underwent a CCT, whose blood samples were analyzed to determine the level of the serum S100β protein. They were managed according to the PECARN clinical decision rule. We afterward assessed the potential decrease in the number of CCTs, according to a modified PECARN clinicobiological decision rule, had we taken into account the result of the blood tests. One hundred nine children were included, and nine of them had clinically important traumatic brain injury. Four of them had a negative S100β value but were classified as high risk of developing intracranial lesion according to the PECARN clinical decision rule. Had we taken into account the modified PECARN clinicobiological decision rule, none of them would have been missed. However, there were 32 true negatives of the rule, allowing a potential decrease in CCTs rated at 29% (95% confidence interval, 21-38). Integrating the serum S100β neuroprotein assessment in the PECARN clinical decision rule could avoid deleterious exposure to CCT radiation, with the condition of using a clinicobiological rule to avoid missing clinically important traumatic brain injuries. Those results have yet to be confirmed relying on a large multicentric study.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of implementing a modified Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule including the S100B protein assay for managing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children.MethodsA before-and-after study was conducted in a paediatric emergency department of a French University Hospital from 2013 to 2015. We retrospectively included all consecutive children aged 4 months to 15 years who presented mTBI and were at intermediate risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We compared the proportions of CT scans performed and of in-hospital observations before (2013–2014) and after (2014–2015) implementation of a modified PECARN rule including the S100B protein assay.ResultsWe included 1,062 children with mTBI (median age 4.5 years, sex ratio [F/M] 0.73) who were at intermediate risk for ciTBI: 494 (46.5%) during 2013–2014 and 568 (53.5%) during 2014–2015. During 2014–2015, S100B protein was measured in 451 (79.4%) children within 6 h after mTBI. The proportion of CT scans and in-hospital observations significantly decreased between the two periods, from 14.4 to 9.5% (p=0.02) and 73.9–40.5% (p<0.01), respectively. The number of CT scans performed to identify a single ciTBI was reduced by two-thirds, from 18 to 6 CT scans, between 2013–2014 and 2014–2015. All children with ciTBI were identified by the rules.ConclusionsThe implementation of a modified PECARN rule including the S100B protein assay significantly decreased the proportion of CT scans and in-hospital observations for children with mTBI who were at intermediate risk for ciTBI.