To completely eliminate androgens of both testicular and adrenal origin, 37 previously untreated patients with advanced (stages C or D) prostatic cancer received the combination therapy using an LHRH agonist (HOE-766) and a pure antiandrogen (RU-23908). The response criteria developed by the National Prostatic Cancer Project were used. A positive response (assessed by bone scan and/or serum prostatic acid phosphatase measured by radioimmunoassay was observed in 29 of the 30 cases who could be evaluated by these objective criteria (97%). The objective response was parallel to a rapid and marked improvement of the clinical signs and symptoms related to prostate cancer (prostatism, bone pain, and general well being). In marked contrast, the same combination therapy applied to patients previously treated with high doses of diethylstilbestrol (13 patients) showed a positive objective response in only 55% of cases. In 23 previously castrated patients showing relapse, an objective response was seen in only 25% of cases after neutralization of adrenal androgens by the antiandrogen. Previous treatment with chlorotrianisene (TACE) had no detectable effect on prostatic cancer and patients having previously received such treatment had a rate of positive response similar to previously untreated patients (five of five). In the previously untreated patients receiving the combination therapy, a 60% fall in serum prostatic acid phosphatase was observed as early as five days after starting treatment, at a time when the serum androgen concentration was 100% to 200% above control. Combined treatment with the pure antiandrogen completely prevents flare-up of the disease, a complication previously found in a significant proportion of patients treated with an LHRH agonist alone. The present data show that complete withdrawal of androgens by combined hormonal therapy with the LHRH agonist (or castration) and a pure antiandrogen leads to a positive objective response in more than 95% of cases as opposed to 60%-70% as reported by many groups using the previous partial hormonal therapy (castration or high doses of estrogens). Adrenal androgens are most likely responsible for this difference. The present study also shows that the proportion of androgen-sensitive cells decreases from more than 95% in untreated patients to 25% to 55% after previous partial hormonal therapy. Such data clearly indicate that the previous partial hormonal therapy exclusively aimed at neutralizing testicular androgens left 25% to 55% of cancer cells having a relatively low sensitivity to androgens in a hormonal milieu compatible with their continuous growth. No clinical or biochemical side effect could be detected except those related to reduced serum androgen levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Etude de l' efficacité d' une technique de coproscopie quantitative pour le diagnostic de routine et le contrôle des infestations parasitaires des bovins, ovins, équins et porcins par J.-P. R A Y N A U D avec la collaboration technique de G. William et G. Brunault Station d e R echerches et D éveloppem ent V étérinaire et A gricole Pfizer B .
The effects of the polypeptide hormone prolactin (PRL) in the development and regulation of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and also in prostate cancer are not very well characterized. This study examines the action of PRL, either alone or in association with androgens [testosterone (T) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT)], in the rat prostate gland. The effects of PRL and androgens were investigated after 30 and 60 days in control, castrated, castrated with a substitutive implant of T or DHT, and sham-operated Wistar rats. To enhance PRL release, we induced hyperprolactinemia by administering chronic injections of sulpiride (40 mg. kg(-1). day(-1)). Chronic hyperprolactinemia induces enlargement and inflammation of the lateral rat prostate without any histological changes on ventral and dorsal lobes. We also demonstrate that hyperprolactinemia induces Bcl-2 overexpression in the lateral rat prostate and that this could inhibit the level of apoptosis. The in vivo model established here is a useful in vivo approach for studying the hormonal regulation of normal and pathological prostate development.
BACKGROUND. Controversy regarding the relative efficacy of treatments for the relief of the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS.This was a 6-month double-blind randomized equivalence study that compared the effects of a plant extract (320 mg Permixon") with those of a 5a-reductase inhibitor (5 mg finasteride) in 1,098 men with moderate BPH using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as the primary end-point. RESULTS. Both Permixon" and finasteride decreased the IPSS (-37% and -39%, respectively), improved quality of life (by 38 and 41%), and increased peak urinary flow rate (+25% and +30%, P = 0.035), with no statistical difference in the percent of responders with a 3 d s e c improvement. Finasteride markedly decreased prostate volume (-18%) and serum PSA levels (-41%); Permixon" improved symptoms with little effect on volume (-6%) and no change in PSA levels. Permixon@ fared better than finasteride in a sexual function questionnaire and gave rise to less complaints of decreased libido and impotence. CONCLUSIONS. Both treatments relieve the symptoms of BPH in about two-thirds of patients but, unlike finasteride, Permixon@ has little effect on so-called androgen-dependent parameters. This suggests that other pathways might also be involved in the symptomatology of BPH. KEY WORDS: 0 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.benign prostatic hyperplasia, phytotherapy, lipidsterol extract of Semoa repens, Permixon", 5a-reductase inhibitor, finasteride
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.