The amalgamation and de-amalgamation period in Montreal (2001de-amalgamation period in Montreal ( -2005 led to the creation of a city in 2006 with 19 decentralized boroughs integrated in a multi-tier metropolitan governance structure. Most recent work on Montreal municipal issues has focused on describing its complex governance structures. Very little attention has been given to the new fiscal relations between the City and its boroughs. Because of the extent of its fiscal decentralization process, the case of Montreal raises the question of how far can it go? Using information collected during meetings with elected officials and public services directors in 2012 and fiscal data analysis, we draw some conclusions on the right level of sub-local decentralization for Montreal. Based on efficiency considerations, the evidence suggests that some responsibilities need to be rescaled leading to more centralization. On the other hand, fiscal autonomy, which enhances accountability at the sub-local level, is also a crucial factor that makes fiscal decentralization work.
This paper examines the importance of fiscal autonomy in the analysis of decentralization. Using new data published by the OECD (2001, 2002), it reproduces several indicators and proposes new measures of decentralization that take into consideration subnational governments' autonomy over their revenues. Two models are reproduced: Davoodi and Zou (1998) on decentralization and economic growth, and Oates (1985), on decentralization and public sector size. Some evidence suggests that fiscal autonomy positively affects economic growth. Also, it seems to affect the size of the state, but evidence on this relation is limited. Despite some statistical weaknesses, there are sufficient indications to argue that subnational governments' fiscal autonomy should be a major concern when measuring decentralization.
La Ville de Montréal affiche une structure de gouvernance décentralisée comprenant 19 arrondissements dotés de conseils élus et d’une certaine autonomie budgétaire. Cette décentralisation inframunicipale est souvent considérée excessive par les acteurs locaux. Quelques études comparatives existent sur la question, mais concernent surtout des villes européennes. Aucune ne permet de situer le cas de Montréal parmi les grandes villes d’Amérique. À travers une recension de documents officiels, la présente recherche propose un tour d’horizon sur la question pour une trentaine de grandes villes d’Amérique. Les arrangements institutionnels en place dans huit grandes villes comportant des entités inframunicipales y sont approfondis : Montréal, Toronto, New York, Los Angeles, Mexico, Bogotá, São Paulo et Buenos Aires. Il s’agit d’une première tentative de caractériser la décentralisation inframunicipale dans un contexte américain. Au final, on s’aperçoit que Montréal est significativement plus décentralisée que les autres grandes villes, mais que le processus est en développement dans certaines villes d’Amérique latine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.