No abstract

Target-derived neurotrophins regulate neuronal survival and growth by interacting with cell-surface tyrosine kinase receptors. The p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR)

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundThe CCR2/CCL2 system has been identified as a regulator in the pathogenesis of neuropathy-induced pain. However, CCR2 target validation in analgesia and the mechanism underlying antinociception produced by CCR2 antagonists remains poorly understood. In this study, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological approaches using a novel CCR2 antagonist, AZ889, strengthened the hypothesis of a CCR2 contribution to neuropathic pain and provided confidence over the possibilities to treat neuropathic pain with CCR2 antagonists.ResultsWe provided evidence that dorsal root ganglia (DRG) cells harvested from CCI animals responded to stimulation by CCL2 with a concentration-dependent calcium rise involving PLC-dependent internal stores. This response was associated with an increase in evoked neuronal action potentials suggesting these cells were sensitive to CCR2 signalling. Importantly, treatment with AZ889 abolished CCL2-evoked excitation confirming that this activity is CCR2-mediated. Neuronal and non-neuronal cells in the spinal cord were also excited by CCL2 applications indicating an important role of spinal CCR2 in neuropathic pain. We next showed that in vivo spinal intrathecal injection of AZ889 produced dose-dependent analgesia in CCI rats. Additionally, application of AZ889 to the exposed spinal cord inhibited evoked neuronal activity and confirmed that CCR2-mediated analgesia involved predominantly the spinal cord. Furthermore, AZ889 abolished NMDA-dependent wind-up of spinal withdrawal reflex pathway in neuropathic animals giving insight into the spinal mechanism underlying the analgesic properties of AZ889.ConclusionsOverall, this study strengthens the important role of CCR2 in neuropathic pain and highlights feasibility that interfering on this mechanism at the spinal level with a selective antagonist can provide new analgesia opportunities.

The diversity and impact of label-free technologies continues to expand in drug discovery. Two classes of label-free instruments, using either an electrical impedance-based or an optical-based biosensor, are now available for investigating the effects of ligands on cellular targets. Studies of GPCR function have been especially prominent with these instruments due to the importance of this target class in drug discovery. Although both classes of biosensors share similar high sensitivity to changes in cell shape and structure, it is unknown whether these biosensors yield similar results when comparing the same GPCR response. Furthermore, since cell morphology changes induced by GPCRs differ depending on which G-protein is activated, there is potential for these instruments to have differential sensitivities to G-protein signaling. Here 1 impedance (CellKey)- and 2 optical-based instruments (BIND and Epic) are compared using Gi-coupled (ACh M2), Gq-coupled (ACh M1), and Gs-coupled (CRF1) receptors. All 3 instruments were robust in agonist and antagonist modes yielding comparable potencies and assay variance. Both the impedance and optical biosensors showed similar high sensitivity for detecting an endogenous D1/D5 receptor response and a melanocortin-4 receptor inverse agonist (agouti-related protein). The impedance-based biosensor was uniquely able to qualitatively distinguish G-protein coupling and reveal dual signaling by CRF1. Finally, responses with a ligand-gated ion channel, TRPV1, were similarly detectable in each instrument. Thus, despite some differences, both impedance- and optical-based platforms offer robust live-cell, label-free assays well suited to drug discovery and typically yield similar pharmacological profiles for GPCR ligands.

No abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may AbstractOur paper provides a comprehensive report of empirical research on tax compliance costs. Compared to previous reviews, our focus is on average costs for sub-groups (individual taxpayers, small businesses, large businesses) and the composition of the cost burden with regards to different cost components (in-house time effort, external adviser costs, other monetary expenses), different taxes (e.g. income tax, value added tax) and different activities like tax accounting and tax planning. In addition, we give a short review of the most important compliance cost drivers and discuss the underlying causes of tax complexity and compliance costs.