The phenomenon of cavitation generally appears close to yielding in the high-density polyethylene. It can affect the yield stress and the properties at large strains. The influence of the microstructural and molecular parameters on cavitation is not well established; it is not even clear whether the cavitation is a cause or a consequence of plasticity. In this work, we focus on the initiation of cavitation and on the nucleation rate. Various polyethylenes with a wide range of microstructural and molecular parameters have been obtained. The cavitation is followed up by SAXS in-situ tensile tests. It is found that, depending on the polyethylene, cavitation can be avoided or, on the contrary, appears before or after yielding. The stresses necessary to initiate cavitation and crystallite shearing have been relied respectively on stress transmitters (tie molecules, interphase, etc.) and crystallite thickness. Then the comparison between the materials has allowed predicting the various polyethylene behaviors. All of the latter have been explained by a simple model based on very few microstructural parameters. Surprisingly, our results have shown that all the scenarios of plasticity and cavitation are possible. One is the cause or the consequence of the other in accordance with the molecular topology and the microstructure.

A series of in situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments are performed during the stretching of weakly and highly vulcanized carbon black (CB), silica and grafted silica filled natural rubber sample (NR). Conversely to literature, Mullins effect observed after one stretching cycle modifies the strain induced crystallization (SIC) behaviour of the sample. The onset of crystallization is ruled by the strain amplification induced by the filler presence. Moreover, fillers (CB and silica) behave as additional crosslinks into NR network, through fillererubber interactions that either accelerate or slow down the crystallization rate depending on NR matrix chemical crosslink density. This is consistent with the assumption that effective network density, which is due to chemical crosslinks, entanglements, and fillererubber interactions, controls the crystallization rate.