No abstract

summary Objective Despite a growing body of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) literature in osteoarthritis (OA), there is little uniformity in its diagnostic application. We envisage in the first instance the definition requiring further validation and testing in the research setting before considering implementation/feasibility testing in the clinical setting. The objective of our research was to develop an MRI definition of structural OA. Methods We undertook a multistage process consisting of a number of different steps. The intent was to develop testable definitions of OA (knee, hip and/or hand) on MRI. This was an evidence driven approach with results of a systematic review provided to the group prior to a Delphi exercise. Each participant of the steering group was allowed to submit independently up to five propositions related to key aspects in MRI diagnosis of knee OA. The steering group then participated in a Delphi exercise to reach consensus on which propositions we would recommend for a definition of structural OA on MRI. For each round of voting, ≥60% votes led to include and ≥20% votes led to exclude a proposition. After developing the proposition one of the definitions developed was tested for its validity against radiographic OA in an extant database. Results For the systematic review we identified 25 studies which met all of our inclusion criteria and contained relevant diagnostic measure and performance data. At the completion of the Delphi voting exercise 11 propositions were accepted for definition of structural OA on MRI. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the tibiofemoral MRI definition against a radiographic reference standard. The diagnostic performance for individual features was: osteophyte C statistic = 0.61, for cartilage loss C statistic = 0.73, for bone marrow lesions C statistic= 0.72 and for meniscus tear in any region C statistic = 0.78. The overall composite model for these four features was a C statistic = 0.59. We detected good specificity (1) but less optimal sensitivity (0.46) likely due to detection of disease earlier on MRI. Conclusion We have developed MRI definition of knee OA that requires further formal testing with regards their diagnostic performance (especially in datasets of persons with early disease), before they are more widely used. Our current analysis suggests that further testing should focus on comparisons other than the radiograph, that may capture later stage disease and thus nullify the potential for detecting early disease that MRI may afford. The propositions are not to detract from, nor to discourage the use of traditional means of diagnosing OA.

The purpose of this study was to describe the age-specific distribution of midfemoral intracortical porosity throughout the cortical width in males and females. Microradiography and an automated image analysis system were used to study midfemoral cortical bone specimens from 163 white people, including 77 males and 86 females, in a recent anthropological collection covering a broad age range. In each specimen, porosity (percentage of the cortical bone area occupied by pores), pore number, and pore size were measured throughout the entire cortex and in three cortical subregions of equal width labeled the periosteal, midcortical, and endosteal subregions. For each gender, relationships linking age to porosity, pore number, and mean pore size were assessed using regression analysis. In addition, age-and site-related changes in these three variables were tested for significance using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Age explained 52% of the porosity variance in females and 13.5% in males. In each gender, there were significant age-and site-related differences in porosity, pore number, and pore size. In adults aged 60 years or younger, both pore size and pore number increased with increasing age, whereas in adults older than 60 years, pore size continued to increase but pore number decreased. In males, the age-related changes in pore size and pore number were proportionally similar in the three cortical subregions. In females, in contrast, the changes predominated in the endosteal subregion and resulted in significant cortical thinning. (J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1308 -1317)

The radiological assessment of muscle properties—size, mass, density (also termed radiodensity), composition, and adipose tissue infiltration—is fundamental in muscle diseases. More recently, it also became obvious that muscle atrophy, also termed muscle wasting, is caused by or associated with many other diseases or conditions, such as inactivity, malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, cancer-associated cachexia, diabetes, renal and cardiac failure, and sarcopenia and even potentially with osteoporotic hip fracture. Several techniques have been developed to quantify muscle morphology and function. This review is dedicated to quantitative computed tomography (CT) of skeletal muscle and only includes a brief comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Strengths and limitations of CT techniques are discussed in detail, including CT scanner calibration, acquisition and reconstruction protocols, and the various quantitative parameters that can be measured with CT, starting from simple volume measures to advanced parameters describing the adipose tissue distribution within muscle. Finally, the use of CT in sarcopenia and cachexia and the relevance of muscle parameters for the assessment of osteoporotic fracture illustrate the application of CT in two emerging areas of medical interest.